Tweet
Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
View Post
-
Hmmm... checking ladbrokes, unibet.... 7.5 -1 is top. Can you confirm that it’s 20-1? It sounds insanely stupid. -
Yeah 20 to 1 sounds crazy. Casinos are not out to lose moneyOriginally posted by BattlingNelson View PostComment
-
Yeah I need somebody other than the wbf wbo ibo guy to confirm please.Originally posted by niceyboo3 View PostComment
-
LOL.
OP tries to make an AJ thread and realizes the only way to get any attention on Anthony Johnson is to include Wilder and Fury in the tite. Really says it all.Comment
-
-
It's a little hard to see. Does it say 8-1? If so its a far cry from 20-1 as the biased alphabet man claimed.Originally posted by b00g13man View PostScreenshot since you can't access the site...
Comment
-
It says Joshua is 1.05. Meaning you win 5 cents for every dollar you bet. Making him a 20 to 1 favorite.Originally posted by BattlingNelson View PostComment
-
-
Maybe we misunderstand? I'm not used to yank betting quotes. If Povetkin wins and you put 1 dollar on him, you get 8 dollars in return. The classic example would be that had you bet on Douglas beating Tyson you'd get your money back 42 times making him a 42-1 underdog right?Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View PostComment
-
Because people really wanted AJ-Deontay but stupid ass AJ and Hearns couldnt get their chit together so Deontay moved on without him with Fury.
Why is that hard to understand?
Why does OP think AJ missing out on the biggest fight available to him to fight another scrub proves something?Comment
Comment