It is largely because Ali and Holmes both said Shavers hit them harder than anyone else.
Ali of course swapped leather with other noted punchers Liston and Foreman. Holmes certainly tasted the best of Tyson.
There are those who decline to rate Shavers with the very best because he was never a world champion, also because many KO victims were not world class. He also had some disappointing losses and this does influence people's opinion on whether to rate him, despite the fact that punch power is of little relevance to a loss.
He was never terribly quick, so it could be said that he sometimes failed to finish off hurt opponents or wasn't a great finisher......this was very much in evidence in the second Holmes fight or the Ali fight.
But I don't doubt that in terms of sheer, raw force he was probably one of if not the best punchers of all time.
Ali of course swapped leather with other noted punchers Liston and Foreman. Holmes certainly tasted the best of Tyson.
There are those who decline to rate Shavers with the very best because he was never a world champion, also because many KO victims were not world class. He also had some disappointing losses and this does influence people's opinion on whether to rate him, despite the fact that punch power is of little relevance to a loss.
He was never terribly quick, so it could be said that he sometimes failed to finish off hurt opponents or wasn't a great finisher......this was very much in evidence in the second Holmes fight or the Ali fight.
But I don't doubt that in terms of sheer, raw force he was probably one of if not the best punchers of all time.
Comment