cause he was disturbed and mentally ill. he wasnt some stinky raghead terrorist doing it in the name of allah. why does everyone use these type of things to defend the terrorists, no wonder we have such a problem in UK with them when everyone loves them so much.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mass Shooting = Mental Health Problem
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by DramaShow View Postcause he was disturbed and mentally ill. he wasnt some stinky raghead terrorist doing it in the name of allah. why does everyone use these type of things to defend the terrorists, no wonder we have such a problem in UK with them when everyone loves them so much.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BostonGuy View PostI don't agree with much of what Soul Survivor spouts, but he is right on this one.
Whadda ****ing biased and inept person Trump is. The facts are not known, or are just surfacing, and he has already render judgement that this was a "mental health" situation.
What a ****ing joke, this guy is. Trump has literally zero critical thinking skills.
trump isn't a dumb guy. he's a top shelf salesman, and that's not a job you can do reading a script. he's being coached about what to say and he's toting the party line. he's a pawn and he's partisan. the guy is not dumb.
Comment
-
Originally posted by soul_survivor View PostAs I said many times before, I can't even make nay of this up. Satire truly is dead.
Muslim commits a crime: "all Muslims must be responsible and Islam is the problem"
Mass shooting by non Muslim, in particular a white person: "let's wait and see" or "it's a mental health issue"
Thank you Trump and all your stupid, mainly American followers.
The latest addition to this is:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...hurch-shooting
Comment
-
It really says a lot about America that we’ve allowed such a moron to reach the highest office in the world.
Something is wrong terribly wrong.
Out of all the Republicans and Democrats to end up with Trump and Hillary proves our election process is broken
Comment
-
Originally posted by soul_survivor View PostAs I said many times before, I can't even make nay of this up. Satire truly is dead.
Muslim commits a crime: "all Muslims must be responsible and Islam is the problem"
Mass shooting by non Muslim, in particular a white person: "let's wait and see" or "it's a mental health issue"
Thank you Trump and all your stupid, mainly American followers.
ter·ror·ism
ˈterəˌrizəm/Submit
noun
the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
This white man shot up a white church, probably full of white Trump supporters. I mean it doesn't get much whiter/conservative than a small TX town. Had he specifically targeted a black church such as that other shooter, then we would know race played a factor.
Secondly, nobody says all Muslims, it's just that MOST terrorist are Muslim. That is an undeniable fact.
Muslims receive religious texts which they are told to follow, their moral compass of this book, Muhammad, is a self admitted terrorist:
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror ...
Furthermore Muslims have religious leaders and teachers which also use these religious texts to guide them.
White people do not receive handbooks on "How to be a white supremacist", White people do not go to school to be taught how to be a white supremacist either. That is why they are called lone wolves, they belong to NOTHING.
Muslims belong to Islam. This has absolutely nothing to do with race and EVERYTHING to do with ideologies which Islam is.
Count the number of terror attacks WORLDWIDE, I'm talking about Philippine Muslims, African Muslims, Kazakh, Indonesian, UK, Eygptian, Yemeni etc. and you'll see it's fcking dominated by Muslims.
There are terror attacks all around the globe DAILY by Muslims.
Did you hear about the 43 Philippine officers killed by one of the many Islamic militant groups which inhabit the area?
http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/26/world/...tle/index.html
What about in Africa, the Mogadishu bombings which killed 23:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...-somalia-hotel
What about the 300 killed in the Somalian car bombings:
http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/16/africa...ths/index.html
What about the attacks in Jakarta, Indonesia:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-05-2...-state/8559292
Just recently a suicide bomber in Yemen:
http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/05/world/...ack/index.html
The 2016 Aktobe shootings in Kazhakstan:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Aktobe_shootings
Policement killed in Egypt:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/...Fattah-al-Sisi
Spain terror attacks:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...we-know-so-far
Germany, France, UK, America, India, no matter where Muslims go they attack.
Even in the fcking Maldives, the Maldives of all places a blogger was killed for criticizing Islam.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ath-in-capitalLast edited by Cutthroat; 11-06-2017, 06:45 PM.
Comment
-
White folks will always Google the definition of "terrorism". They'll live by the literal translation of the word when it suits their agendas. Yet the white man always seems to forget the legal definition in the land or state they reside in.
Nevada state law defines terrorism as “any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death to the general population”. Notice there's no mention of political or religious reasons.
Stephen Craig Paddock shot and killed at least 59 people and injured more than 500 others. If that doesn’t qualify as a textbook definition of Nevada’s terrorism law, I don’t know what does. His murderous rampage in Vegas should qualify as terrorism. The federal code defines “domestic terrorism” in part as “activities that appear intended to affect the conduct of government by mass destruction”.
It’s hard, if not impossible, to understand how committing one of the largest mass shootings in American history is not “intended to affect the conduct of government”.
White people and their dictionaries. First it was the Bible and now it's the dictionary. Hilarious.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sir_Didymus View PostWhite folks will always Google the definition of "terrorism". They'll live by the literal translation of the word when it suits their agendas. Yet the white man always seems to forget the legal definition in the land or state they reside in.
Nevada state law defines terrorism as “any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death to the general population”. Notice there's no mention of political or religious reasons.
Stephen Craig Paddock shot and killed at least 59 people and injured more than 500 others. If that doesn’t qualify as a textbook definition of Nevada’s terrorism law, I don’t know what does. His murderous rampage in Vegas should qualify as terrorism. The federal code defines “domestic terrorism” in part as “activities that appear intended to affect the conduct of government by mass destruction”.
It’s hard, if not impossible, to understand how committing one of the largest mass shootings in American history is not “intended to affect the conduct of government”.
White people and their dictionaries. First it was the Bible and now it's the dictionary. Hilarious.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sir_Didymus View PostWhite folks will always Google the definition of "terrorism". They'll live by the literal translation of the word when it suits their agendas. Yet the white man always seems to forget the legal definition in the land or state they reside in.
Nevada state law defines terrorism as “any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death to the general population”. Notice there's no mention of political or religious reasons.
Comment
Comment