Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jerry Quarry vs Jack Sharkey

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by TheGreatA View Post
    He could be. Carnera in their first fight hardly landed a punch on him and Sharkey was doing a job on both Dempsey and Schmeling until low blows ended the bout (and a follow-up left hook in the case of the Dempsey fight).
    coulda, woulda, shoulda`s dont really count, Carnera was to tall & heavy and slow of foot to be a clever boxer in the same way as Valuev..Dempsey was old and gave Sharkey a lesson in boxing "bobbing & weaving" Dempsey was far too much for him and beat him quite easily, wasn`t as tho Sharkey was putting on a display like Gene Tunney did against Dempsey... nothing wrong with Dempseys left-hook that levelled Sharkey.. (referre`s instructions are "protect yourself at all times")

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Post
      coulda, woulda, shoulda`s dont really count, Carnera was to tall & heavy and slow of foot to be a clever boxer in the same way as Valuev..Dempsey was old and gave Sharkey a lesson in boxing "bobbing & weaving" Dempsey was far too much for him and beat him quite easily, wasn`t as tho Sharkey was putting on a display like Gene Tunney did against Dempsey... nothing wrong with Dempseys left-hook that levelled Sharkey.. (referre`s instructions are "protect yourself at all times")
      Sharkey was winning arguably every round until Dempsey hit him with numerous, blatant low blows.

      This doesn't look like an "easy" fight:



      Carnera was a much better boxer than Valuev.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by TheGreatA View Post
        Sharkey was winning arguably every round until Dempsey hit him with numerous, blatant low blows.

        This doesn't look like an "easy" fight:



        Carnera was a much better boxer than Valuev.
        i have the full fight and Dempsey wins it in my opinion.. Dempsey was 7yrs older than Sharkey and at the tail-end of his career.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Post
          Quarry was good enough to beat one of the "Classiest boxers" of all time in Floyd Patterson...
          Muhammad Ali said : "Patterson was the best boxer he ever fought"...
          floyd patterson was also 10 years older than quarry , wasn't he ?

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by frankenfrank View Post
            and since what age was the older frazier boxing from ?
            and the older frazier , norton , ali and chuvalo haven't fought in brutal slugfests ?
            it was his lack of technique and his inadequate power that made his fights grueling.


            because he was too chinny to maintain his title

            and 10 years older than quarry himself at that

            against that same fighter whom was 10 years older than himself with a more respected amateur past himself btw.

            maybe someday i will.

            i do not idolize shavers , i only claim he should be ranked higher than quarry , that's all.

            David Tua would have Knocked out Quarry inside 4.
            4 is just for safety measures. 1 or 2 is the more realistic knowing tua.
            This guys might be the worst poster ever

            Comment

            Working...
            X
            TOP