Is it fair to say that both Joshua and Wilder are rare talents.

[Furn]

They are exciting fighters to watch and are improving and it will be a great fight but honestly, a prime Lewis could probably beat them both on the same night.

[juggernaut666]

Hey short bus

You realize Deontay also started late and in a shorter time, with less amateur fights also went to the Olympics and captured a bronze

Deontay wouldn't have defeated the competition Joshua did .

The key word here is also Bronze , how are those great refined skills looking today ?

How do you think other olympic champions rate his technical skills off camera ?


Three points .

1 .Wilder boxed THREE years as an amatuer before turning pro .

2 . Joshua boxed FOUR years as an amatuer before turning pro .

3 .They were ONE year in age apart .18 /19


With ONLY 18 fights in the amateurs they wanted Joshua to turn pro.

What was Wilder doing in 18 fights ?

What is Wilder doing now in 40 compared to Joshuas 21 ?


Joshua only had EIGHT more amatuer fights than Wilder did before turning pro !


You TRIED using experience as an excuse for Wilders skills , yet he has MORE experience at the HW pro rankings ( DOUBLE IN FACT )

Dont you see how stupid you look now ?





AGAIN !

[tokon]

Neither are 'rare' boxing talents.

They are just superior physical specimens in terms of muscle mass, height and overall physicality.

It pains me to say that the true definition of a 'rare talent' would be Floyd.

I too view neither Joshua or Wilder as "rare talents" in boxing terms.

[hugh grant]

But Josh is very talented for someone who took up boxing late

[tokon]

But Josh is very talented for someone who took up boxing late

If he was 6-2/215 I don't think he'd be looked upon as "talented" . .

[hugh grant]

If he was 6-2/215 I don't think he'd be looked upon as "talented" . .

Not rare talented but talented. Being one of the best right now means he's the best of bad bunch
Bruce Lee is rare talent