OFFICIAL: Donald Trump thread.

[Tomjas]

This is getting good. Anyone have popcorn?

SCHIFF-PELOSI CAUGHT IN UKRAINIAN ARMS SCANDAL: Giuliani Confirms TGP’s Prior Exclusive – Schiff and Pelosi’s Ukrainian Donor Was Given Lucrative Defense Contracts!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...nse-contracts/

It’s Giuliani

Might as well quote Alex Jones

[man down]

It’s Giuliani

Might as well quote Alex Jones

Guess we'll soon see. There's plenty of documents I'm sure.

[jaded]

Well here's an interesting tidbit...

John Solomon is reporting tonight on Hannity that US officials knew in March of this year that Ukraine was reopening the Burisma case and specifically looking into funds that went from Burisma to Hunter Biden:

Here’s the important part of what Solomon reported:

I can confirm to you tonight that the US government had open source intelligence and was aware that as early as February of 2019 that the Ukrainian government was planning to reopen the Burisma investigation. This is long before the president ever imagined having a call with President Zelensky. In fact it’s before President Zelensky was even elected. This is a significant shift in the factual timeline. This is information that was omitted from the whistleblower’s complaint.



Solomon goes on to explain that Nabu, an anti-corruption company in the Ukraine (which incidentally was started by Joe Biden), requested a reopening of the investigation into Burisma, its owner, and its unusual transactions in February of 2019. In the following month, on March 28, the general prosecutor’s office agreed to open an investigation and filed a “Notice of Suspicion”.

At the heart of the investigation are illicit funds that were running through Burisma from 2010-2015, which Solomon says is important because Hunter Biden was on the board of the company for the last two of those years. Solomon even says the Notice of Suspicion says that Hunter Biden’s firm may have been part of these illicit funds moving through the company.

Solomon confirms that US officials knew about all of this via open source intelligence. The question is whether the so-called whistleblower knew about this (being in intelligence) and intentionally omitted it from the whistleblower report because it didn’t fit the narrative, or whether they knew about it at all.

John Solomon - New Information Invalidates Essential Whistle Blower Claim
Ukraine decided to re-open Burisma investigation in February 2019. Long before the Trump Zelensky phone call. Information omitted from the whistle blower complaint. @jsolomonReports #UkraineBiden #Burisma pic.twitter.com/N0CMq4S7ZK

— TrumpSoldier (@DaveNYviii) October 9, 2019

[man down]

Well here's an interesting tidbit...

John Solomon is reporting tonight on Hannity that US officials knew in March of this year that Ukraine was reopening the Burisma case and specifically looking into funds that went from Burisma to Hunter Biden:

Here’s the important part of what Solomon reported:

I can confirm to you tonight that the US government had open source intelligence and was aware that as early as February of 2019 that the Ukrainian government was planning to reopen the Burisma investigation. This is long before the president ever imagined having a call with President Zelensky. In fact it’s before President Zelensky was even elected. This is a significant shift in the factual timeline. This is information that was omitted from the whistleblower’s complaint.



Solomon goes on to explain that Nabu, an anti-corruption company in the Ukraine (which incidentally was started by Joe Biden), requested a reopening of the investigation into Burisma, its owner, and its unusual transactions in February of 2019. In the following month, on March 28, the general prosecutor’s office agreed to open an investigation and filed a “Notice of Suspicion”.

At the heart of the investigation are illicit funds that were running through Burisma from 2010-2015, which Solomon says is important because Hunter Biden was on the board of the company for the last two of those years. Solomon even says the Notice of Suspicion says that Hunter Biden’s firm may have been part of these illicit funds moving through the company.

Solomon confirms that US officials knew about all of this via open source intelligence. The question is whether the so-called whistleblower knew about this (being in intelligence) and intentionally omitted it from the whistleblower report because it didn’t fit the narrative, or whether they knew about it at all.

John Solomon - New Information Invalidates Essential Whistle Blower Claim
Ukraine decided to re-open Burisma investigation in February 2019. Long before the Trump Zelensky phone call. Information omitted from the whistle blower complaint. @jsolomonReports #UkraineBiden #Burisma pic.twitter.com/N0CMq4S7ZK

— TrumpSoldier (@DaveNYviii) October 9, 2019

They screwed with the wrong guy this time. He doesn't care who goes down.

[travestyny]

I have to admit. No matter what ultimately happens with this current situation, it has been real funny watching you Trump supporters scramble for deflections

[jaded]

They screwed with the wrong guy this time. He doesn't care who goes down.

Biden/Pelosi/Shiff/Romney...they're all dirty swamp creatures. They're all squirming now like a worm on the hook. Whatever happens now...that all this crap is coming out is the best thing that could have happened.

[man down]

I have to admit. No matter what ultimately happens with this current situation, it has been real funny watching you Trump supporters scramble for deflections

Listen, we know your not a R or a Dim but we're sure that you're against this kind of thing right? I mean if the dims framed Trump that's a bad thing right?

[man down]

Biden/Pelosi/Shiff/Romney...they're all dirty swamp creatures. They're all squirming now like a worm on the hook. Whatever happens now...that all this crap is coming out is the best thing that could have happened.

Yes sir that's why I voted for him.

[Tomjas]

Giuliani, Hannity, Solomon

Complete clown show

[travestyny]

Listen, we know your not a R or a Dim but we're sure that you're against this kind of thing right? I mean if the dims framed Trump that's a bad thing right?

How would they have framed him? Did they get on the phone and tell him what to say? That's not logical.


If the "Dims" did something wrong, they should go down for it. That still doesn't change that Trump has to be held responsible for his own actions as well.