I hate it when some posters make statements based on what they have heard or read from other posters not based on there own experience.
For example, if say a popular poster states that Hagler definitely beat Leonard then there is a ripple effect, at a later date the same poster will make a thread on how Hagler 'destroyed' Leonard even though 9/10 they haven't seen the fight or weren't even on some occasions born to hear what people at that time thought.
Another good one is 'Foreman is the hardest hitting heavyweight' based on watching the Frazier fight???
Yet if another poster comes back with a great point of Shavers hitting harder based on that poster watching dozens of Shavers fights and dozens of Foremans fights it still does not hold water?
Then the insults start!
For example, if say a popular poster states that Hagler definitely beat Leonard then there is a ripple effect, at a later date the same poster will make a thread on how Hagler 'destroyed' Leonard even though 9/10 they haven't seen the fight or weren't even on some occasions born to hear what people at that time thought.
Another good one is 'Foreman is the hardest hitting heavyweight' based on watching the Frazier fight???
Yet if another poster comes back with a great point of Shavers hitting harder based on that poster watching dozens of Shavers fights and dozens of Foremans fights it still does not hold water?
Then the insults start!
Comment