I don't have a problem with it. He lost to an ATG, but is much better than the rest.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
why is PAC still ranked so highly and he is 3-3 in his last 6 fights
Collapse
-
He didnt look great vs rios or algeri.
An eff vs timmy 2 he was losing that fight for a bit . And won a competitive fight. if only timmy wasnt featherfisted.
Manny has been shot since juan iced him imo. Crawford will unravel him
Comment
-
Originally posted by therealpugilist View PostI still think he is a top 5 welterweight but he hasn't been dominant or impressive the last 5 years over top notch fighters
The mayweather loss wasn't close
Jmm knocked him out and arguably won the 3rd fight, I had JMM by 2 rounds
The Bradley 1 was competitive but pac won that fight IMO
Outside of Bradley PAC hasn't beat a top notch welterweight in a long time
ESPN has him #1 and the ring has him ranked #2....that's a bit too high when he hasn't been consistent
Brook, Thurman, khan and porter should be ranked higher because of their consistency and they actually fight welterweights not making guys move up to face them
IMO he should be around 5-6
Lost to Floyd. So what.
Got ktfo by jmm. So what. Jmm is elite level and strong. Getting ktfo in boxing is what it is. Lest not to get paq was whippin jmm up until the ko. There is a reason y jmm doesn't want to fight again
Bradley got lucky he didn't win that fight. He was a victim of arums criminality.
We cannot forget what paq has done career wise.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spoon23 View PostHe never lost to Bradley
He never really lost to a juiced up running hugging Floyd
He only lost to a roided up Marquez.
So that is why..
So, do you have excuses for all your favorite fighters? Or just PAC?
Well, to answer the question posted--here's your answer; people are fanboys
Comment
-
Probably on the basis on of beating then #3 P4P Bradley who came off of beating Marquez and beating then champ Algieri, and considering those loses are to fellow top dogs Marquez and consensus #1 P4P Mayweather (and that other "loss" to Bradley).
The top at 147 is up for taking if someone gets a couple good wins in, right now a lot of the top guys haven't looked as good as one would hope - Thurman got keeled over by Collazo, Khan got rocked by Algieri, Kell Brook been fightin Euro bums. At least Porter and Bradley are coming off of good wins but I wouldn't place them at the top.
Or perhaps like Ward's #2 P4P rating it is on the basis of ancient achievements.Last edited by BrometheusBob.; 10-27-2015, 10:58 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Deevel916 View PostMakes sense. I thought the OP was speaking about Pac's pfp ranking. Not WW ranking.
Its a legitimate explanation he gave though
He did beat highly ranked Bradley last year
I think he should be around 4-5 most times a fighter takes 2-3 losses they get booted out of the rankings altogether
It happened to Alexander after the porter n khan losses
Happened to other fighters as well
He should be top ten but #1....I don't think so too many recent losses n a ko loss to a guy who was unranked at the time, JMM
Comment
-
Originally posted by jorgepichardojr View PostYour post essentially answers itself
Lost to Floyd. So what.
Got ktfo by jmm. So what. Jmm is elite level and strong. Getting ktfo in boxing is what it is. Lest not to get paq was whippin jmm up until the ko. There is a reason y jmm doesn't want to fight again
Bradley got lucky he didn't win that fight. He was a victim of arums criminality.
We cannot forget what paq has done career wise.
How long is he suppose to be number 1 based off beating cotto last decade n catch weights with losses sprinkled in? He is no lower than 6 in my book
Comment
-
Originally posted by jorgepichardojr View PostYour post essentially answers itself
Lost to Floyd. So what.
Got ktfo by jmm. So what. Jmm is elite level and strong. Getting ktfo in boxing is what it is. Lest not to get paq was whippin jmm up until the ko. There is a reason y jmm doesn't want to fight again
Bradley got lucky he didn't win that fight. He was a victim of arums criminality.
We cannot forget what paq has done career wise.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mneronava2k View PostPAC was hardly "whippin" Marquez. Compare the knockouts and how often Marquez was tagging the careless PAC. He fell right into Marquez' trap.
Comment
Comment