Don't think so. Marquez and Pacquaio are possibly/probably top 40-60 all-time but nobody else is top 100. Compare that to Robinson, Greb, Armstrong, Charles, Langford for example have multiple wins over top 25-30 (even top 10 guys) all-time and a plethora of top 50. Each one probably has around 7-10 of the top 100 all-time on their resumes.
Names alone I'd put Floyd's somewhere around 20 or so but it's only two truly great fighters he fought (Marquez and Pacquaio) - that falls short.
Well that logic is floored because their is no p4p set in stone for you to say Robinson, Greb and Armstrong have more wins over top 20 fighters.
There is no way on earth you can tell any sane Boxing fan with two eyes, who can actually watch Greb and Armstrong, that they're better than Floyd. Look at the stances, it's totally different eras. You can spin it how you like. Floyd fought a better level of competition. The footage is there.
Post 1 fight from either fighter that is on the level of any Floyd fight please?.
You have to measure relative to their era's if your talking all-time. Did I say they are better now and would beat him heads up? Point to me where I said that.
Comment