Meh he's ok. A decent pundit but some of the questions he asks in interviews are loaded. I much prefer Jim Watt and Paulie as pundits though.
Both Watt and Paulie are very analytical in their commentary
Paulie rubbed me the wrong way as a fighter, I appreciated his boxing ability, but he seemed to of caught Cotto Syndrome, he never lost a fight that went to the cards. Atleast most of his fanbase didn't by into his delusions. And he did have legit argument vs. the baby bull.
But as a commentator, he's MONEY!!! Very articulate and on point with X's and O's. In fact, I began to appreciate him more as a fighter due to his commentating.
Paulie rubbed me the wrong way as a fighter, I appreciated his boxing ability, but he seemed to of caught Cotto Syndrome, he never lost a fight that went to the cards. Atleast most of his fanbase didn't by into his delusions. And he did have legit argument vs. the baby bull.
But as a commentator, he's MONEY!!! Very articulate and on point with X's and O's. In fact, I began to appreciate him more as a fighter due to his commentating.
Not gonna lie I hate Pauly as a fighter but as a commentator I kinda dig him....
Comment