Now we know why GGG wanted no part of Ward

[brettWall]

Idiotic post.

So you want to see someone you hate not only move up, but fight the #1 guy in the division?

Don't you morons think that is a mismatch? Which other fighter do you ask the same thing?

Charlo only had to fight a one-legged opponent when he moved up and you were okay with it. Yet you want Golovkin to fight Ward, eh?

Don't know why you morons keep perpetuating this nonsense. It's despicable.

[Curt Henning]

[QUOTE=dibzvincent143;19119269]Guess we just have to use logic on this one. Would wilder— a guy known for knocking cans as well— perform better today against joshua than he will lets say 3-4 years from now?? Of course he would!

Jacobs fight happen when GGG is already 35. Brook when he was 34. It’s quite easy to connect the dots here.
No fighter is better at 36 than they were at 30. (Only hopkins come to mind)

right..i know no fighter at 36 is better physically than he is at 30...ive already stated that

what im saying is that we dont know how good golovkins peak was because his comp/resume stinks during that time

all of the guys youve mentioned, sans wilder, have solid resumes with legit comp during their primes...youve mentioned oscar, floyd, pac......

we simply cant gauge how good golovkins peak was.....many of golovkins fans, pre jacobs, claimed that golovkin was a young fighter for his age that hadnt taken much punishment and could prob fight well enough into this 40s(this was actually said by many here and elsewhere)....the minute he looked less than stellar the narrative changed....coincidentally this happened once he stepped up above C level guys

[Curt Henning]

Guess we just have to use logic on this one. Would wilder— a guy known for knocking cans as well— perform better today against joshua than he will lets say 3-4 years from now?? Of course he would!

Jacobs fight happen when GGG is already 35. Brook when he was 34. It’s quite easy to connect the dots here.
No fighter is better at 36 than they were at 30. (Only hopkins come to mind)

Pac and floyd are not better at 36 than they were at 30, and those are ATGs. Let alone GGG.

right..i know no fighter at 36 is better physically than he is at 30...ive already stated that

what im saying is that we dont know how good golovkins peak was because his comp/resume stinks during that time

all of the guys youve mentioned, sans wilder, have solid resumes with legit comp during their primes...youve mentioned oscar, floyd, pac......

we simply cant gauge how good golovkins peak was.....many of golovkins fans, pre jacobs, claimed that golovkin was a young fighter for his age that hadnt taken much punishment and could prob fight well enough into this 40s(this was actually said by many here and elsewhere)....the minute he looked less than stellar the narrative changed....coincidentally this happened once he stepped up above C level guys

[Citizen Koba]

I feel like this is going a bit too far now. So what if ward would beat golovkin? Does that make him a. Bad fighter?

It is standard practice, I believe, to gloat over a fanbase when their fighter loses. In due course GGG will get the props he deserves and find his place in the greater scheme of boxing history. Outstanding fighter though perhaps short of elite in the skills department. A pivotal figure in his division for most of a decade and only beaten at 36... sad thing is we never got to see him against really top class opposition in his prime.

[Fists_of_Fury]

Idiotic post.

So you want to see someone you hate not only move up, but fight the #1 guy in the division?

Don't you morons think that is a mismatch? Which other fighter do you ask the same thing?

Charlo only had to fight a one-legged opponent when he moved up and you were okay with it. Yet you want Golovkin to fight Ward, eh?

Don't know why you morons keep perpetuating this nonsense. It's despicable.

Most of your fellow hype job bunboys asked Floyd to fight GGG @160lbs. Floyd never said 147-160lbs like GGG 154-168lbs. either. I didn't want GGG to fight Ward until I heard the anyone from 154-168lbs. so that's on them for talking **** when they had no intentions of fighting outside of 160lbs.

[ruedboy]

One thing's for sure, Golovkin's not beating Ward in Vegas. Short of bringing a knife into the ring, Andre was allowed to get away with anything. (Rumor has it the Nev. Comm. was considering allowing the knife)

[buddyr]

He was able to compete well during his late age against an elite prime fighter in Canelo. For me that’s enough evidence he’d do slightly — if not totally better — in his prime.

Watching his performances and training videos, we can already compare the vast difference in his speed today and 6 yrs ago.

It’s like saying oscar wouldn’t perform better in his prime against Floyd when he was able to hang in there and win 4 rounds when he was 34 and inactive.

Seriously no pressure attacker in history have gone better at 36 than they were, lets say 30.

You ever heard of a guy named Bernard Hopkins? Who also at 41 jumped up to lthvy and beat the top guy? Not a cherry picked champion, but the TOP guy..

[bigdunny1]

GGG knocks out everyone from 154 to 168. Ward goes to sleep - GGG fans in 2017

GGG face mangled by canelo and running from Mexican style from the little man? now its excuses. Bytched showed up at the press conference looking like Rihanna lol



I was robbed check the compubox and count the jabs that got in on Chris brown - GGG 2018

[buddyr]

Sure buds

It was less then 2 years ago Keith was the boogeyman and everyone at WW was supposedly afraid of him now all of a sudden he went b.itch made

F.uck off

You’re a clown if you actually believe that

2 years ago Spence was also callign him out. Thurman said if Spence gets a belt, they can unify. Spence got a belt and and he's been getting hurt after every fight ever since

[buddyr]

When floyd chose not to fight Margarito and Williams, it was called smart business. As usual, the stance changes depending on who is doing what.

floyd been ducking fighters since 135. His fan base are idiots too