Parliament-Funkadelic
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Beatles or Rolling Stones?
Collapse
-
-
The Beatles>>> Stones for only 6 years of work (Rubber Soul- Let it Be), since a lot of people wanna discount their first few years as manufactured pop BS (kinda fair).... However if you add Wings, Lennon/Ono Plastic Band and Traveling Wilburys to their resume it is literally 120-108. and BTW the Rolling Stones are just as, if not even more a product of manufactured image and promotions as the Beatles. Lennon> Richards/Brian Jones, McCartney> Jager, Harrison> Wood/Taylor. Really only favorable matchup for the Stones is that Watts is a slightly less **** drummer then Ringo.
hell, ELO> Stones......Last edited by Rudyo; 04-09-2018, 11:00 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Rudyo View PostThe Beatles>>> Stones for only 6 years of work (Rubber Soul- Let it Be), since a lot of people wanna discount their first few years as manufactured pop BS (kinda fair).... However if you add Wings, Lennon/Ono Plastic Band and Traveling Wilburys to their resume it is literally 120-108. and BTW the Rolling Stones are just as, if not even more a product of manufactured image and promotions as the Beatles. Lennon> Richards/Brian Jones, McCartney> Jager, Harrison> Wood/Taylor. Really only favorable matchup for the Stones is that Watts is a slightly less **** drummer then Ringo.
hell, ELO> Stones......
please literally shoot yourself.
Comment
-
Originally posted by New England View Postplease literally shoot yourself.
Wish you would have been one of those ****s that got blown to smithereens at the marathon, maybe they'd have given you normal length prosthetic arms.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rudyo View PostI'll do that as soon as you can reach the top shelf of any cabinet.
Wish you would have been one of those ****s that got blown to smithereens at the marathon, maybe they'd have given you normal length prosthetic arms.
sounds like it hurt
and it should. you think elo is better than the stones. you should be hurt.
Comment
-
Originally posted by New England View Postsounds like it hurt
and it should. you think elo is better than the stones. you should be hurt.
New England
Do you have a sig of Paul Williams cause you wish you had 50% of his reach?
Comment
-
beatles
but I've never heard a beatles songs I've been amazed by in any way (lyrics, musicianship, etc). just good tunes, that's it. 4 average ass guys come together lol
Comment
-
My :2 cents:..Beatles were astounding song writers. VERY innovative, creative, and talented. Did you ever see a book of guitar chords, and compare a Beatles songbook (chords)?
They know so many chords, it really is amazing. I played for 20 years, and was pretty good, but how can one learn so many chords at such a young age? Astounding. I had a hard time playing some songs. They made it look like a walk in the park.
The Stones...greatest rock and roll band, and together to this day. They weren't the greatest at their instruments, but what they did know and have, they used it very well.
Take the drummer; Charlie Watts. He was okay, Not very talented, but he was perfect for the Stones.
Just like Ringo was also a pretty basic drummer, he was a big part of the Beatles sound, as was Charlie for the Stones.
Comment
Comment