Originally posted by MOTHERDUCKER
View Post
He gets credit at Chelsea and he deserves it. But even though we scored 100 goals in a league campaign and beat all our rivals both home and away - has that ever been done? Chelsea still only won it by a point. So it indicates that tactically he can face problems when the players aren't on it.
I think the football would be better but I doubt it would be a foregone conclusion that United would finish 2nd and pick up trophies with him.
I think you can throw a blanket over United, Liverpool, Spurs, and hopefully Chelsea when they stop being ******ed.
Question for Fenomeno - how much do you pay for your season ticket? I heard you can pick one up for £300.
I think I've spent more than that going to 3 Chelsea games this season.
It's weird that someone watching Ipswich town pays more to watch (apparently an average ticket price of £32) - I literally don't know a single one of their players - to a City fan who is watching Aguero, De Bruyne, Silva, and Sane.
It's why I don't understand Chelsea's need to spend a billion pounds on a stadium that gate money is pittance really. But Spurs and Arsenal will happily rip off fans. Chelsea aren't quite as bad but my OAP uncle could pick up 3 City season tickets for the cost of his one.
I don't know what Chelsea get out of a new big stadium. It won't make them a better team. Unless they sold the ground and moved to Surrey and spent a billion quid on new players.
If I was a Chelsea pitch owner I'd sell my share with the proviso they'd sell that prime real estate and move somewhere cheaper and buy Neymar or something.
Comment