Originally posted by Eff Pandas
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Jermall Charlo - his 5 best wins
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Postand spoken about as P4P greats already
Quit fake newsing this place.
Or if its one or two dummies saying dummy sh^t call out those dummies don't act like EVERYONE is saying some dummy sh^t when EVERYONE is clearly not saying.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eff Pandas View PostLOL you guys & your always extreme opinions. Please tell me who gots either Charlo marked down as a P4P great already?????
Quit fake newsing this place.
Or if its one or two dummies saying dummy sh^t call out those dummies don't act like EVERYONE is saying some dummy sh^t when EVERYONE is clearly not saying.
Comment
-
Why do his 5 best wins even matter?
All that matters is he won the fights required by the sanctioning body to be the #1 contender. As the #1 contender, GGG is required to defend the title against him or he will be stripped of the belt.
When they fight, barring any BS, the best man will win. Nothing wrong if people think or want that to be Charlo.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View PostCome on eff, you see these threads here and on other sites, asking like the Charlos are the boogeymen at 154/160. After the Jacobs fight they all talked about Charlo destroying him, they continue to insist GGG is ducking him. Meanwhile, neither of them fought anyone at 154 outside of Williams--who I'm not sure was all that good to begin with. Jermell is about to fight his brother's leftovers in a washed up/never-was Trout. Meanwhile, neither Charlo fought Canelo, Andrade, Lara or Hurd. Not sure whose fault that was or who was avoiding who, but Lara looks washed up now, so it wouldn't surprise me if Jermell takes a fight with him late this year or in 2019. They are PBC fighters in the mold of Stevenson and Wilder. Lots of potential but avoiding or stalling on the best fights.
The Charlo's are in that spot that many of the guys who are #1 right now were in at one point. Thurman. GGG himself. Spence.
Too good for their own good. There is more risk then reward for fighting them. If you fight them & lose you are on their resume dressing it up a lil more & if you win you just beat the guy who sure is the boogieman in the division, but doesn't got that sexy resume that'll do you much good necessarily.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostWhy do his 5 best wins even matter?
Whats wrong with talking about any particular guys top 5 opponents? As long as the soul purpose isn't just tearing a guy down like so many dipsh^ts here do. But if we wanna see where a guy is at right now vs what he maybe capable of in the near future or how far he still needs to go I don't think looking at the top 5 is bad or negative in anyway.
I think Charlo gots one of the best resumes at 160 right now. You don't get in the top 5 (where I got him) w/o a top resume usually.
Comment
-
eff pandas I didn't block you for anything you did in particular but the booty in your profile pops up at work
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eff Pandas View PostWe can't talk about boxing stuff here no more?!?!?!
Whats wrong with talking about any particular guys top 5 opponents? As long as the soul purpose isn't just tearing a guy down like so many dipsh^ts here do. But if we wanna see where a guy is at right now vs what he maybe capable of in the near future or how far he still needs to go I don't think looking at the top 5 is bad or negative in anyway.
I think Charlo gots one of the best resumes at 160 right now. You don't get in the top 5 (where I got him) w/o a top resume usually.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eff Pandas View PostI mean you don't think they ARE the boogiemen of their respective divisions right now? And thats a far cry from being ATG P4P guys & all that like you dramatically said originally.
The Charlo's are in that spot that many of the guys who are #1 right now were in at one point. Thurman. GGG himself. Spence.
Too good for their own good. There is more risk then reward for fighting them. If you fight them & lose you are on their resume dressing it up a lil more & if you win you just beat the guy who sure is the boogieman in the division, but doesn't got that sexy resume that'll do you much good necessarily.
Charlos doesn't belong to the boogieman conversation because Spence/GGG were actually ducked heavily that they can't make a big fight.
GGG boogieman duckers - Saunders, Martinez, Canelo, Cotto, Sturm, Geale (When he was unified) Quillen, Jacobs (I don't consider jacobs ducking, just stalling because of thinking he needs to be paid as it should be.)
Spence boogieman duckers - Garcia, Thurman, Porter, his mandos
Charlo 154 boogieman - Lara.....yet Andrade-Hurd wasn't in that conversaiton
Charlo 160 - Saunders, Canelo.......that's it. Jacobs called his bluff already the moment he stepped in the MW division.Last edited by Thraxox; 05-07-2018, 10:44 AM.
Comment
-
Comment