Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GOOD READ: There Certainly Wasn't Any Floyd Mayweather In Muhammad Ali

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GOOD READ: There Certainly Wasn't Any Floyd Mayweather In Muhammad Ali

    There Certainly Wasn't Any Floyd Mayweather In Muhammad Ali

    By Frank Lotierzo

    One of the reasons Muhammad Ali is the real heavyweight GOAT--greatest of all time--was because he was willing to fight the biggest and the baddest heavyweights circa 1960-81. As a green fighter on the way up or an aging champ on the way down, it didn't matter, Ali constantly sought to face whoever was thought to be the fighter who represented his biggest threat. He also never ran from a tough opponent in trying to get out of a rematch. Just examine his record.

    After a 43-month forced exile Ali fought top five contenders Jerry Quarry and Oscar Bonavena in a span of six weeks during 1970. On December 30th, three weeks after a tough 15-rounds with Bonavena, Ali signed to meet undefeated heavyweight champ "Smokin" Joe Frazier on March 8th 1971. Ali lost conclusively to Frazier that night and Sports Illustrated plastered the picture of Joe knocking him down in the 15th round with the caption "End Of The Ali Legend" on its cover, dated March 15th 1971. Frazier said after the fight that he doubted Ali would want a rematch after the beating he took during their bout. When that was relayed to Ali, he responded, "Oh, how wrong he is!" And those words sum up Muhammad Ali's confidence and courage.

    When Ali couldn't get a rematch with Frazier immediately after their first fight, he set out to fight every top contender in the division, trying to eliminate the field so Frazier would have no one left to fight but him. Twenty-one months after winning the "Fight Of The Century," Frazier was demolished by George Foreman in two rounds and lost his undisputed title. Two months later Ali lost a split decision to Ken Norton. Later the same year (1973) Ali won a decision over Norton in a rematch and then four months later won a decision over Frazier to even their series at 1-1. Two months after Ali beat Frazier, Foreman crushed the other Ali conquerer, Ken Norton, in two rounds.

    After Foreman beat Norton, the path was clear for Ali to try and reclaim the title he was stripped of seven years earlier. Only he'd have to do it against a fighter who mutilated the only two opponents that Ali had to fight twice (at that time) before he could claim a victory over either one of them. In twenty-seven rounds with Frazier, Ali was only able to hurt Joe twice, once in each fight. On the other hand, Frazier lasted just two minutes with Foreman before going down three times in the final minute of the first round, and then three more times in the first minute and a half of the second. When comparing how Ali and Foreman fared versus Norton, the gap was just as pronounced. Ali hurt Norton twice during their rematch and in twenty-four rounds forced him back three or four times but never put him down or was close to stopping him. Yet, Foreman needed just five minutes to knock Norton all over the ring enroute to stopping him in two short rounds.

    No fighter in history ever looked more unbeatable and like a human wrecking machine at any weight than did former heavyweight champ George Foreman circa 1973-74. Foreman was 40-0 (37) and was just 25-years old. At the time both Jack Dempsey and Joe Louis said on The Wide World of Sports that Foreman was the most devastating and hardest puncher in boxing history. At that time Ali was months away from turning 33 and was thought to have no legs - as evidenced by him only dancing and fighting on his toes for the first four rounds of the Frazier rematch and the first five of the Norton rematch.

    If ever there was a fighter who could've demanded some kind of test for HGH or steroids or anything else before a fight, it was Ali before he fought Foreman. Muhammad could've easily said how come 2-3 years ago light heavyweight Gregorio Peralta could last ten rounds with Foreman twice, but Frazier and Norton couldn't make it out of the second against him? But we never heard that kind of talk from Ali. In fact, if the thought even existed that Foreman was on some type of HGH or PEDs, Ali would've said something like - "good, I hope he's on them the night I fight him because I'm still gonna whip his behind." And then he would've demanded Foreman take or inject whatever he thought he needed to make himself feel invincible and unbeatable.

    As of this writing the biggest welterweight fight since De La Hoya-Trinidad is in limbo because Floyd Mayweather can't grasp Manny Pacquiao's ascension as a fighter. Pound for pound Pacquiao doesn't look anywhere near as dangerous at 147 as did Foreman look as a heavyweight. And remember both Ali and Mayweather are virtually the same age going into the negotiations for the bout.

    The only evidence that Pacquiao has ever used PEDs are Mayweather's insecurity and accusations. And that's enough to make Floyd think he needs to control the terms of the fight to once again have an edge before it starts. Mayweather is no doubt a great fighter, but his resume has too many holes in it to be compared to the greatest of the greats at 135 and 147. However, if he went on to fight and beat a prime Pacquiao in a straight up fight without trying to mickey the terms of it, we could say he did beat one great fighter who, though he was smaller, was still at the top of his game.

    Mayweather has looked really muscled up in his last two bouts. Being bigger than Marquez is one thing, but he looked like Mosley's father when they were in the ring earlier this month. Luckily there was no Floyd Mayweather in Muhammad Ali - or we would've never seen Foreman-Ali in 1974, a fight that Muhammad actually fought in a small 17 foot ring (the reason the ropes were loose), which everyone reading this knows was advantage Foreman. Can anyone fathom Ali making demands (testing for PEDs or anything else) on a smaller opponent before they fought because he looked too good in his last three or four fights?

    Mayweather-Pacquiao or Pacquiao-Mayweather has to happen. And if it does within the next 12-months, as of this writing I'd favor Mayweather because he looks too big and physically strong for Manny, something that was confirmed even more so after observing Mayweather's physicality during his last bout against Shane Mosley.

    http://www.thesweetscience.com/boxin...-muhammad-ali/

  • #2
    wow amazing read. Muhammad Ali is a true warrior. He is one of the bravest and most mentally strong human beings of all time.

    Comment


    • #3
      It was a nice article up until he made his pre-excuse in case Floyd win the fight..

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by M@nny View Post
        If ever there was a fighter who could've demanded some kind of test for HGH or steroids or anything else before a fight, it was Ali before he fought Foreman. Muhammad could've easily said how come 2-3 years ago light heavyweight Gregorio Peralta could last ten rounds with Foreman twice, but Frazier and Norton couldn't make it out of the second against him? But we never heard that kind of talk from Ali. In fact, if the thought even existed that Foreman was on some type of HGH or PEDs, Ali would've said something like - "good, I hope he's on them the night I fight him because I'm still gonna whip his behind." And then he would've demanded Foreman take or inject whatever he thought he needed to make himself feel invincible and unbeatable.
        i can imagine ali saying that

        Comment


        • #5
          dont even mention ali and maywaethe in the same sentence

          Comment


          • #6
            Damn...You wrote all this after sucking a fat ass #@*+?

            Comment


            • #7
              made a thread about this already

              http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=390089

              Floyd will never be GOAT, its too late for him its too risky now. even if he beats pacquiao all he will get from it is bragging rights, that will be all. he will be known in the future as the boxer who have the skills the greatest of all times that never was and hes only got himself to blame. he may have amassed fortunes fighting and that will be the highlight of his career. the boxer who have the skills but lacks the substance. a racing car that never entered a real race. he will also be known as a queer who throws tantrums on interviews, who coughs out contradictions and nonsense. im a gorilla, im a dog, twenty years from now that will be the funniest **** any boxer in history have said. floyd mayweather will be remembered as a circus act, no disrespect to Harlem globtrotters, he will be like them in comparison to the NBA. so much skills but only for show not for competition.
              __________________

              Comment


              • #8
                Floyd mayweather hasn't done anything legendary in his career. I can accept him to be a HOF but to suggest that he is legendary is absurd in my opinion.

                Comment


                • #9
                  That's why he's the FIGHTER OF THE DECADE too LOL. Pac amazing span of almost fighting back to back Barerra, Marquez, and Morales is hella awesome. To top it off, he than had another run with Dela Hoya, Hatton, and Cotto.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I see you covered your tracks by saying if mayweather does win its because he was small. I agree were you said there is no evidence of pacquiao using PEDs BUT there is evidence of his trainer training a fighter that was using steroids. Ariza is a legend in the PED game.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP