Aside from his promotional antics, you basically summarized why he was overrated. People liked seeing a smaller guy with an aggressive style beat up on large, less skilled opponents. People loved that back when Dempsey beat Willard.
You seem to be under the impression that this was some big secret or that people forgot about his size disadvantage. No. It was part of the appeal.
I see the fun in that, but it doesn't make him the greatest boxer of all time nor warrant all the attention his private life received.
Size is simply part of the sport at heavyweight. You don't get extra points for being smaller.
You seem to be under the impression that this was some big secret or that people forgot about his size disadvantage. No. It was part of the appeal.
I see the fun in that, but it doesn't make him the greatest boxer of all time nor warrant all the attention his private life received.
Size is simply part of the sport at heavyweight. You don't get extra points for being smaller.
Comment