Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
BJ Saunders 2nd Drug Sample Tested Clean, We Have A Fight! SAUNDERS vs ANDRADE!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by NahMean View PostThat is true but his B sample is negative so he’s proven innocent by VADA’s own rules if B sample is clean the first test is disregarded.
They test the A sample first not knowing what to look for, if there is drugs found then they test the B sample knowing what to look for..... if they can't find it in the B sample then no rules have been broken.
Learn something every day...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vinnykin View PostAhhhh, so I just read VADA rules and the samples are taken from the same container. 90ml of urine is collected, 30ml in the B sample and the rest in the A sample.
They test the A sample first not knowing what to look for, if there is drugs found then they test the B sample knowing what to look for..... if they can't find it in the B sample then no rules have been broken.
Learn something every day...
Comment
-
Originally posted by NahMean View PostHe still has a hearing and needs to be cleared by the commission but I’ll be absolutely shocked if he doesn’t get licensed after presenting them with negative test. Therefore, despite it not being confirmed by any outlet.. I’m 100% positive this fight will go ahead. Just waiting on a official announcement.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DramaShow View PostHe cheated. I don't get how a second test clears anything up, if there was drugs in one test it means he cheated surely.Originally posted by Vinnykin View PostAhhhh, so I just read VADA rules and the samples are taken from the same container. 90ml of urine is collected, 30ml in the B sample and the rest in the A sample.
They test the A sample first not knowing what to look for, if there is drugs found then they test the B sample knowing what to look for..... if they can't find it in the B sample then no rules have been broken.
Learn something every day...
In the case of BJS, Dr Goodman at VADA said the oxilofrine could have "resulted from" the presence of a legal dose of ephidrine. Maybe they took that into account and analysed the B sample in a different way?
Comment
-
Originally posted by NahMean View PostEddie had a deal ready with the #2. Victor Conte did countless posts and interviews on how strong Oxilofrine was. Andrade wanted to fight the #2. Now the true champ BJ Saunders has been cleared. B sample came back negative. This likely has ignited a fire within Saunders. Game on!
Comment
-
Originally posted by kafkod View PostHearn would have wanted to cover his base, no doubt about that. But he also wants as many viewers as possible for his DAZN shows, so I think he will be relieved if Andrade can fight BJS instead of some obscure African who's name I can't remember!
Comment
-
Originally posted by kafkod View PostTrue, they don't bring charges against anyone unless both samples test positive for the same banned substance. That's because of the possibility of mistakes or contamination during the analysis.
In the case of BJS, Dr Goodman at VADA said the oxilofrine could have "resulted from" the presence of a legal dose of ephidrine. Maybe they took that into account and analysed the B sample in a different way?
As proven today, I didn't even know how A and B samples worked What I do know is that the B sample is negative, BJS is clean, fight is on!!!
Comment
-
Comment