Anyone ever seen Carl Froch fight? He's slow as molasses, marginally athletic and doesn't possess true one punch knockout power.
Kovalev on the other hand is athletic, fast and a true power puncher.
That all those tangibles away from Kovalev and what is he?
He sure is hell isn't Carl Froch.
Without any shred of doubt Froch is the better fighter overall. He's one of the best to ever compete in this sport considering the amount of natural deficits he was able to overcome. Carl Froch is the definition of underrated. To this day I cannot believe everything he accomplished.. It's insane. People thought he was complete **** in the early years.
Kovalev on the other hand is athletic, fast and a true power puncher.
That all those tangibles away from Kovalev and what is he?
He sure is hell isn't Carl Froch.
Without any shred of doubt Froch is the better fighter overall. He's one of the best to ever compete in this sport considering the amount of natural deficits he was able to overcome. Carl Froch is the definition of underrated. To this day I cannot believe everything he accomplished.. It's insane. People thought he was complete **** in the early years.
Comment