Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Charlo beats trout and williams..suddenly best at 160?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Charlo beats trout and williams..suddenly best at 160?

    Where is the logic in this stuff?

    Saunders Dominates a live dawg and KO artist in lemeuix, but charlos win over old man austin trout has him as the biggest contender in the division.

  • #2
    I don't get it either. Oh well.

    Comment


    • #3
      Let the bandwagon hoppers have something to ride for a bit. Same folks who rode with Gary Russell, Qullin, and Broner before they actually did jack shhh in the sport and when they lost their step ups they moved on to the next.

      Comment


      • #4
        Who said Charlo was the best in the division? What are you guys talking about?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by lolpz View Post
          Who said Charlo was the best in the division? What are you guys talking about?
          I;m seeing it a lot on this board.

          **** like "charlo is the best in the division but saunders ill prob get a shot at GGG first"

          Charlo has fought scrubs for the most part

          Comment


          • #6
            Trout would probably beat Lemieux

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by turnedup View Post
              Let the bandwagon hoppers have something to ride for a bit. Same folks who rode with Gary Russell, Qullin, and Broner before they actually did jack shhh in the sport and when they lost their step ups they moved on to the next.
              And the same people are completely discrediting sunders win over lemeuix.

              Lemuix is twice as good as anyone Charlo has been in with

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Mammoth View Post
                Trout would probably beat Lemieux
                trout was long done and still gave a good account of himself against charlo/

                Not to mention how undersized he was.

                Trout was journeymen status when Charlo fought him

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by jmrf4435 View Post
                  trout was long done and still gave a good account of himself against charlo/

                  Not to mention how undersized he was.

                  Trout was journeymen status when Charlo fought him
                  Trout would beat Alcine even

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by jmrf4435 View Post
                    I;m seeing it a lot on this board.

                    **** like "charlo is the best in the division but saunders ill prob get a shot at GGG first"

                    Charlo has fought scrubs for the most part
                    That's really weird lol, all Charlo did was fight a mandatory but he hasn't proven himself.

                    The only proven guys at 160 right now are Canelo, GGG, Jacobs, and then I'll be nice enough to throw Saunders in there. The rest need to fight each other.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP