Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Canelo: While I'm at 155-Pounds, I'm Not Facing Anyone at 160

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Muahahaha... Clown

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Divine Hammer View Post
      what manny weight???? get a clue. manny turned pro at minimumweight and didn't start using catchweights until he reached WELTERWEIGHT!!!!!! hahahahaha. and manny never comes even close to abusing catchweights like fraud canelo. NEVER. manny's catchweight fights made sense. canelo's doesn't. understand???

      Hey, pacstain..... Manny was much worse than Canelo....

      Read the bold before you start making clueless comments !


      Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
      " one or two " ?

      No, no, no..... try 8 or 9 weight-affected fights, most of them consecutive.

      Why attempt to minimize it ?

      Pac coined the phrase " manny-weight ", and he was labelled as "the catchweight king".





      Rubbish !

      Pac campaigned at manny-weight, and Canelo campaigns at canelo-weight.

      Pac was actually much worse, he bought the little guys up, and he bought the big guys down..... he contractually manipulated a weight advantage over his opponents, sometimes draining them.....

      ..... the ONLY difference is, Canelo does not drain his JMW opponents, he gives himself an extra pound that they likely don't benefit from.

      NOBODY is letting Canelo off the hook, what he is doing is lame and unprofessional..... but stating that Canelo is worse than Pacquiao is completely incorrect.

      You are simply making excuses for Pacquiao, he should have had more respect for the sport, and more respect for his opponents..... JUST LIKE CANELO!





      Canelo beat the JMW Cotto, in a money-fight..... let's keep it real here.

      He should obviously drop the belt.

      Ignoring the fact that Canelo has never fought AT middleweight, and the fact that he has never fought A middleweight..... is at least remiss, if not dishonest.

      Here is your problem with Canelo/Golovkin.....

      You are making weak excuses to excuse your guy from doing something that he stated for THREE YEARS was no problem at all...... and in doing so you are preventing him from becoming the lineal champ.

      Canelo has never stated that he is a middleweight, let alone THE BEST middleweight..... and yet Golovkin has been stating that he can beat anyone at 154 for the last 3 years.....

      Canelo did not lie to me, Golovkin did..... and we all know that Golovkin pulled that same catchweight rubbish on Ward, and we all know that he justified that catchweight by stating that he is the A-side.

      ..... why make excuses for Pacquiao and Golovkin, they are actually BOTH much worse than Canelo.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
        So, let the record show..... that weak excuse is not valid..... just like the other weak excuses.
        Let the record show, that you can't tell the difference between one situation and another.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by SUBZER0ED View Post
          Let the record show, that you can't tell the difference between one situation and another.

          You have missed the point.

          Your entire argument was based around this.....


          Originally posted by SUBZER0ED View Post
          Sanchez said that, not Golovkin.

          Well, that statement has been proven to be highly incorrect.....

          ..... so, Golovkin CAN make 154, for lil old feather-fisted Floyd.....

          ..... but not 155 for the lil red kid.


          So, let the record show..... Golovkin could take that fight, but he doesn't want to.

          So he has passed on Ward/Lara/Canelo..... and why the fk isn't he chasing Cotto?..... everyone else is chasing Cotto because he has faded and because he is still likely the 2nd/3rd best payday in the sport.

          Why isn't Golovkin desperate to fight BOTH of those guys, like everyone else is...... especially considering the fact that he has done NOTHING and he has no other options.

          Other than Mayweather, which is a no-brainer...... it seems like Golovkin wants nothing to do with movers/spoilers, or any world-class fighter who can test him.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
            You have missed the point.

            Your entire argument was based around this.....





            Well, that statement has been proven to be highly incorrect.....

            ..... so, Golovkin CAN make 154, for lil old feather-fisted Floyd.....

            ..... but not 155 for the lil red kid.


            So, let the record show..... Golovkin could take that fight, but he doesn't want to.

            So he has passed on Ward/Lara/Canelo..... and why the fk isn't he chasing Cotto?..... everyone else is chasing Cotto because he has faded and because he is still likely the 2nd/3rd best payday in the sport.

            Why isn't Golovkin desperate to fight BOTH of those guys, like everyone else is...... especially considering the fact that he has done NOTHING and he has no other options.

            Other than Mayweather, which is a no-brainer...... it seems like Golovkin wants nothing to do with movers/spoilers, or any world-class fighter who can test him.
            I opened with that statement, but it wasn't the cusp of my argument. My main point is that Golovkin shouldn't have to lose weight to fight somebody who has a belt in the same class as him, yet walks around heavier than him. That's a clear disadvantage. Anyone who demands that of him has no confidence that Canelo can win at equal weight.

            I disagree about Cotto. He's past his prime. Canelo beat him, as did Floyd, Pac, Trout & Margacheato. Only Floyd has beat Canelo. he's in his prime & has a MW belt. He's the biggest money fight out there that is naturally closest to Golovkin's weight. Besides, Cotto has expressed utter reluctance to fight Golovkin.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
              Hey, pacstain..... Manny was much worse than Canelo....

              Read the bold before you start making clueless comments !
              u are so clueless hahahahahaha. the only catchweights that were to pac's advantage was cotto and maybe margarito. oscar challenged manny at 147 when he was just a lightweight, so it's not his fault. so that means 2.

              and what smaller fighters did manny (who is a small welterweight) bring up???? algieri was 5'10" and outweighed manny. bradley is about the same height as manny and outweighed him on fight night. marquez is slightly taller than manny and outweighed him too. hahahahahahahhaa. again, manny isn't bringing up guys two weight classes below him and outweighing them by 20+ lbs like ur fraud hero canelo.

              and again manny is a former flyweight world champion that didn't start using catchweights until he reached welterweight. canelo is a former jr. middleweight champion who refuses to fight at 160 lb limit where he is champion. doesn't take a genius to see that what canelo is doing is worse.
              Last edited by Divine Hammer; 05-09-2016, 05:06 PM.

              Comment


              • "While I am at this weight, I will not fight someone who weighs 160lbs - that would be an advantage to the opponent -''

                Comment


                • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                  " one or two " ?

                  No, no, no..... try 8 or 9 weight-affected fights, most of them consecutive.

                  Why attempt to minimize it ?

                  Pac coined the phrase " manny-weight ", and he was labelled as "the catchweight king".





                  Rubbish !

                  Pac campaigned at manny-weight, and Canelo campaigns at canelo-weight.

                  Pac was actually much worse, he bought the little guys up, and he bought the big guys down..... he contractually manipulated a weight advantage over his opponents, sometimes draining them.....

                  ..... the ONLY difference is, Canelo does not drain his JMW opponents, he gives himself an extra pound that they likely don't benefit from.

                  NOBODY is letting Canelo off the hook, what he is doing is lame and unprofessional..... but stating that Canelo is worse than Pacquiao is completely incorrect.

                  You are simply making excuses for Pacquiao, he should have had more respect for the sport, and more respect for his opponents..... JUST LIKE CANELO!





                  Canelo beat the JMW Cotto, in a money-fight..... let's keep it real here.

                  He should obviously drop the belt.

                  Ignoring the fact that Canelo has never fought AT middleweight, and the fact that he has never fought A middleweight..... is at least remiss, if not dishonest.

                  Here is your problem with Canelo/Golovkin.....

                  You are making weak excuses to excuse your guy from doing something that he stated for THREE YEARS was no problem at all...... and in doing so you are preventing him from becoming the lineal champ.

                  Canelo has never stated that he is a middleweight, let alone THE BEST middleweight..... and yet Golovkin has been stating that he can beat anyone at 154 for the last 3 years.....

                  Canelo did not lie to me, Golovkin did..... and we all know that Golovkin pulled that same catchweight rubbish on Ward, and we all know that he justified that catchweight by stating that he is the A-side.

                  ..... why make excuses for Pacquiao and Golovkin, they are actually BOTH much worse than Canelo.
                  who cares what triple g said? he lied to you? who are you? and what did he lie about? fighting at 154 or 168 ? so what ? you and everyone that do not like him is for no real boxing reason. the fact that you said that triple g lying to you is worst than canelo keeping the 160 limit title away from the 160 limit shows that you just have a problem with triple g

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by letsgobrady View Post
                    who cares what triple g said? he lied to you? who are you? and what did he lie about? fighting at 154 or 168 ? so what ? you and everyone that do not like him is for no real boxing reason. the fact that you said that triple g lying to you is worst than canelo keeping the 160 limit title away from the 160 limit shows that you just have a problem with triple g

                    he lied to you too buddy

                    Most adult human beings don't seem to like that too much.

                    Comment


                    • he lied to you too buddy

                      Most adult human beings don't seem to like that too much.

                      Then again, apparently some don't mind at all


                      Originally posted by Divine Hammer View Post
                      i love Pac
                      Originally posted by letsgobrady View Post
                      who cares what triple g said?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP