Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Which boxer in their prime would never lose to another fighter?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    I'd say Pacquiao if he stuck at 140.

    Great fights with Tszyu, Chavez, Mayweather, Whittaker, & Crawford to be had.

    Comment


    • #72
      We just had one Floyd.

      Comment


      • #73
        pac-tards think pac would beat anyone.

        pac-tards think a 2009 roided pac would beat mayweather,JMM, hagler, hearns, duran, Leonard, prime de la hoya and mosley all in ONE NIGHT and at the SAME TIME!!!

        isnt that right you stupid delusional pac-tards. pac needs his salt water in between rounds and his punchers gloves DOE!!

        GGGoons think the same for GGG, that he would beat calzgahe, ward, hopkins, de la hoya, trinidad duran hagler etc etc at the same time same night.

        stupid filthy GGGOONS
        Last edited by bambam182; 02-19-2017, 06:54 PM.

        Comment


        • #74
          I'm inclined to say Roy Jones Jr as well

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by BM dnobagaV View Post
            I'd say Pacquiao if he stuck at 140.

            Great fights with Tszyu, Chavez, Mayweather, Whittaker, & Crawford to be had.
            this idiot just illustrated my point. ROFL.

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by The Hound View Post
              Wow this is dumb, a blind man and his dog knows alis prime is the latter of the 60's he was sharp and moved unlike anything the heavyweight division had or has ever seen and still had the same chin,his weakness in some fights was toying with fighters and giving them chances like cooper

              A ready and focused ali like the one that fought listen beats every heavyweight thats ever exsisted
              Ive already posted this and proved it to be wrong...you can THINK Ali in the 60's was better but you would be wrong! Foreman would k.o Ali of 1967 rather easy and that's just ONE example not even included alis OWN words that a blind man can listen too which i posted !

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by bambam182 View Post
                this idiot just illustrated my point. ROFL.
                Hearns, Leonard, Hagler never fought at 140.


                Everybody else on that list, Pacquiao could possibly beat prime for prime at 140. 140.

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by BM dnobagaV View Post
                  I'd say Pacquiao if he stuck at 140.

                  Great fights with Tszyu, Chavez, Mayweather, Whittaker, & Crawford to be had.


                  You're apparently too stupid to understand timelines.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    In and out of prime, Floyd.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by joseph5620 View Post
                      You're apparently too stupid to understand timelines.
                      .... Prime 2008 Pacquiao vs. Prime 1992 Whittaker. Or Prime 2003 Tszyu.

                      Get the idea, prick?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP