Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wilder is the A-Side in the U.S

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by DuckAdonis View Post
    I can Guarantee you that the fight makes more money in the UK than in the US
    That's weird because Eddie Hearn disagrees with you, Anthony Joshua disagrees with you, Al Haymon disagrees with you, Deontay Wilder disagrees with you and Showtime disagrees with you. Literally everybody disagrees with you.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
      That's weird because Eddie Hearn disagrees with you, Anthony Joshua disagrees with you, Al Haymon disagrees with you, Deontay Wilder disagrees with you and Showtime disagrees with you. Literally everybody disagrees with you.
      Wow. This guy is acting like Wilder is some PPV star like Tyson or something.
      Go and take your nonsense elsewhere.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
        That's weird because Eddie Hearn disagrees with you, Anthony Joshua disagrees with you, Al Haymon disagrees with you, Deontay Wilder disagrees with you and Showtime disagrees with you. Literally everybody disagrees with you.
        And you disagree with everyone who is not a wilder man fan

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
          Wilder vs Breazeale would generate more in the US that Joshua vs Miller. Obviously Joshua vs Miller would generate more worldwide.

          That doesn't answer my question.

          Comment


          • #25
            You realise that CNN and other news channels didnt mention Wilder right ?


            As a matter of fact they mistook Wilder HIMSELF as Lennox Lewis . lol

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by genrick View Post
              Wow. This guy is acting like Wilder is some PPV star like Tyson or something.
              Go and take your nonsense elsewhere.
              Someone said the fight would make more being held in the UK than being held in the US.

              Something even Hearn & Joshua have admitted isn't true. They've both said the fight would make less in the UK and they want the fight in the UK even though they'll make less.

              So the poster saying the fight would make more in the UK is clearly an idiot.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by EnglishOxide View Post
                That doesn't answer my question.
                Yes it does. You asked which fight would generate more money, and I said that worldwide, the AJ fight would.

                Doesn't change the fact that Wilder vs AJ would generate more worldwide if held in the US, something even Hearn and AJ admit. Typically for a huge fight, you hold it wherever you can maximize the revenue. For Hearn & AJ to refuse to maximize the revenue, especially after AJ's bluff was called on the 50 million, is essentially a duck. The fact that Wilder is so confident he can win by knockout that he's willing to go to the UK for less money doesn't change the fact that it's ludicrous to refuse to maximize the revenue.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
                  Yes it does. You asked which fight would generate more money, and I said that worldwide, the AJ fight would.

                  Doesn't change the fact that Wilder vs AJ would generate more worldwide if held in the US, something even Hearn and AJ admit. Typically for a huge fight, you hold it wherever you can maximize the revenue. For Hearn & AJ to refuse to maximize the revenue, especially after AJ's bluff was called on the 50 million, is essentially a duck. The fact that Wilder is so confident he can win by knockout that he's willing to go to the UK for less money doesn't change the fact that it's ludicrous to refuse to maximize the revenue.

                  No.

                  We were talking about who the A side for a fight in America was. As in, who generates the most and who earns the most which is typically how it's defined.

                  You claimed Wilder was A side, but you know Joshua earns more even if they fight separately in the U.S.

                  Now you state that the fight earns more worldwide if staged in the U.S. And by your own opinion that is due to Joshua's worldwide popularity yes?

                  So in what way is Wilder the A side in the U.S?

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Wilder isnt even the A side in his own bedroom.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by Thraxox View Post
                      Let's cut the B.S Joshua is the A-side in the U.K and Wilder is the A-Side in the U.S

                      Reason why: Donald Trump

                      Basically when trump opened his mouth about Wilder infront of 300 million Americans when Wilder visited the whitehouse for the pardon of the late Jack Johnson it translated: Hey Watch this guy, he has 39 KO's in 40 fights and is the heavyweight champion like Jack Johnson! You better watch him!

                      That line alone would is 10x the promotion that Wilder has in his entire career because the POTUS endorsed you!
                      this is actually quite true.... casuals who dont follow will look up wilder especially because trump mentioned his record.....

                      imo just better for boxing overall in general

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP