because when you think about it besides being the youngest heavyweight champ (before tyson) he didnt' do anything that big
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rocky Marciano vs Floyd Patterson
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by RockyMarcianofan00Patterson really wouldn't be the best he'd probably be the biggest name fighter he ever fought though
because when you think about it besides being the youngest heavyweight champ (before tyson) he didnt' do anything that big
beside lose to ali
Comment
-
Originally posted by Southpaw StingerHe became the first man to win the heavyweight title twice.
Comment
-
Originally posted by butterfly1964he also was the first to regain the hw championship.
ya see what i'm getting at he was good but not a great in the same sense
________
Medical marijuana seedsLast edited by RockyMarcianofan00; 08-23-2011, 07:17 AM.
Comment
-
of couse Patterson should had never lost the title to Ingo in the first place.
Had Dempsey, Louis, Charles and others had a shot to regain the title from Ingo. They would have done it.
But GREAT fighters like Charles, Tunney and Marciano stop these old greats to being the first to regain the title.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kid Achilles View PostEzzard Charles was better than Patterson.
To be fair to that more life and death fight era, the ref did tell Rock he was going to stop the fight in the next rd if he couldn't take care of business, and the rest history in the moment!
Comment
-
While I doubt Marciano would have ever been a Heavyweight Champion BEFORE WWII, I KNOW Floyd would not have been.
Floyd couldn't take a punch well. Marciano could punch well. To say the least.Last edited by Rusty Tromboni; 05-17-2020, 05:30 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by osamabinwayne View PostI don't know much about Patterson but from what I hear he was greatly skilled, used the same defense as Tyson, and had hand speed under Ali's. He however had the weakest chin of all heavyweights and anyone that comes in the ring with Rocky is going to get dropped on their face. Patterson however had alot of heart and would probably get up several times to continue the the fight. I see Patterson stinging Rocky in the first several rounds losing on the score cards until Rocky starts to heat up and unleashes bombs after bombs until the Ref calls the fight. Rocky TKO by 9. Please give me your insights.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Yogi View PostAbsolutely!
With the exception of handspeed and possibly punching power, Ezzard Charles was simply a better & more skilled fighter than was Floyd Patterson...Much better defense, footwork, versatility, pure boxing technique, counterpunching skills, overall balance, quicker upperbody reflexes, toughness, chin, etc., etc.
Comment
Comment