Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

wait a second... ray austin was 6'6 and had longer reach

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by El Cabron View Post
    it's cause he's taller than most (not all) of his opponents, and a lot of people think his style is predicated on having that type of physical advantage

    it's kind of unfair to be critical of him for that though, because its not like quality 6'6" and up boxers grow on trees
    but people always say... test him against a tall boxer, test him against someone his own size... yet they forgot ray austin...

    the point of this thread, is that wlad is not just all size, but skill as well..

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by boxingking500 View Post
      but people always say... test him against a tall boxer, test him against someone his own size... yet they forgot ray austin...

      the point of this thread, is that wlad is not just all size, but skill as well..

      They mean guys like this



      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by boxingking500 View Post
        im not going to go in to if ray austin is a bum or not

        but what im trying to say is that, people say wlad only fights people smaller than him, or people he outreaches...

        ray austin was the same heigh as wlad, and had longer reach

        but was destroyed by wlad
        ray austin is a good journeyman , low level contender at one point.


        people say a lot of things. don't make it true.

        Comment

        Working...
        X
        TOP