Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Today's NBA is so soft

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by The Tase View Post
      it takes skills to make 3s. dunking is just height.

      3 > 2.
      Spudd Webb might not agree with you.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Adamjr91 View Post
        Controversial but, 3 point shot more impressive than Slam-Dunk
        spoken like a true brit who doesn't know jack shit about basketball. thanks for upholding that stereotype!

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by The Tase View Post
          it takes skills to make 3s. dunking is just height.

          3 > 2.
          Why are we even going there???

          I appreciate both , yes consistently hitting 3s is a much harder craft. And I would say that dunking is not all about height. At least not the way these vicious dunkers demonstrate. I'd say these involve some impressive athleticism and cojones , if you know what I mean.

          But why compare the two at all?? Its like comparing a strike to a diving catch..

          Comment


          • #15
            Let the knicks goon squad play these dudes , Anthony Mason and Charles Oakley. Them guys use to "body" players back in the day.

            Comment


            • #16
              Pistons, Sixers, and Knicks teams back in the 80's and 90's had some fuggin goons.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by MODAPHUKA View Post
                WTF?? I dont think so , but....

                Make your case..
                Well the obvious answer is you get one more point making a three pointer than a dunk. The less obvious point but still fairly obvious, league average 3 point % is around 30%, dunking has got to be in the upper 90% range. I guess a Dunk looks prettier though.
                Last edited by Adamjr91; 01-17-2014, 12:04 PM.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by bayarea69 View Post
                  spoken like a true brit who doesn't know jack shit about basketball. thanks for upholding that stereotype!
                  still butthurt over the Football thread I see.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Adamjr91 View Post
                    Well the obvious answer is you get one more point making a three pointer than a dunk. The less obvious point but still fairly obvious, league average 3 point % is around 30%, dunking has got to be in the upper 90% range.
                    also; any idiot can shoot a 3, but a lot of nba players never even attempt a dunk. guys can't usually dunk into the twilight of their careers, that's when they have to become 3 point shooters. making a 3 is more impressive on the stat sheet, but not on the highlight reel. class dismissed, limey.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      I would beat Lebron IMO.



                      Jordan > Lebron.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP