Tweet
What the **** did he do to deserve that? What's his best win Danny Wiliams? He's best known for LOSING.
Here's the list they had to vote.
Here's the list they had to vote.
-
-
why are you mad? -
I just don't know how out of those fighters Vitali Klitschko can be among the best 3.Originally posted by Alx. View PostComment
-
Vitali is a great head to head fighter against anyone but a HOFer and before Wlad ? I cant agree with that ,many more fighters in other weight classes deserve it . Its almost as bad as putting Tyson Fury on a top ten list of greatest of all time and voting for him . lolComment
-
Wlad just semi-retired a couple months ago. Would be a little early to put him in the HOF.Originally posted by juggernaut666 View Post
Anyway I would have definitely voted for Winky Wright. None of the other names on the list deserve to be in his presence (Morales is a given, Vitali kind of ushered in a new HW era, Winky is the weird one to me).Last edited by ////; 12-06-2017, 10:33 AM.Comment
-
No idea but hall of fame means very little when evaluating a boxer.Comment
-
Originally posted by juggernaut666 View Post
you're in no position to laugh at the voting if you don't know that fighters must be retired for five years before they're eligible.Comment
-
One of the weakest resumes of any HoFer imo.
Very poor induction.Comment
-
the 3 fighter induction rule is bs. IF there arent 3 great fighters on the list then no need to force it.Comment
-
Yes, they included a guy who had actual wins against legitimate foes instead of literal bums.Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View PostWhat the **** did he do to deserve that? What's his best win Danny Wiliams? He's best known for LOSING.
Here's the list they had to vote.
How odd.Comment
Comment