Tweet
he should never have gone in with golovkin. But he did because eddie hearn is a money grabber.
-
-
You are now complaining about a promoter, who tries to give the fans the best fights.Originally posted by leppard365 View Post -
It was a crazy move, but fighters fight for money.Comment
-
Was never about giving the fans the best fight. Was always about making £££ like it always is with him.Originally posted by Scary View Post
He fought a guy 2 weight classes above him that was known as the fiercest puncher on the planet.
Risked his fighters health for £££.
That's hearn for ya.Comment
-
Kell didnt have to accept the fight but he did..for the sake of money...Originally posted by leppard365 View PostComment
-
Hearn will get someone hurt one day though. Putting Dave Allen in with Ortiz was awful, especially when Allen is too tough for his own good.Comment
-
A fighter will never say no. He's a fighter. He doesn't want to be seen as weak. Plus he'll be blind to the realities of the situation.Originally posted by southpaw_07 View Post
An outsider like promoter can see it though. And instead of using common sense he saw an opportunity for £££ and made it.
'Win-win' they were saying. Well brook's career is done. So much for win-win eh?Comment
-
He asked for the fight. He wanted to one up Khan and he was well paid for it, can't blame Hearn for that.Comment
-
B+ troll thread.Comment
-
Spence was going to make Brook quit even prior to GGG
The GGG fight gave Brook a payday, so at least Brook retires with some good money
Look Spence is just a better fighter, Brook had nothing to trouble him, Spence upped a gear and Brook folded
The problem with Brook, he fought 30 plus bums, he was never a war tested warrior,Comment
Comment