There is currently no differentiation between organisation titles
They are all corrupt. The IBF probably least so, but their rankings are abysmal. There really is no difference.
Are we really prepared to say Garcia was historys champion over Pacquiao, because he held the WBC? No, of course not.
Nowadays, the fighter makes the title.
So in order, it would look like this:
WBC - Wilder / WBO - Parker
IBF Joshua
WBA / Ring / Lineal - Vacant
I can't differentiate between a Stiverne win, or Ruiz & Takam. There are non champions like Klitschko and Pulev who rank higher than the champions.
The winner of Joshua/Klitschko for the WBA/IBF will have the most legitimate championship, however.
They are all corrupt. The IBF probably least so, but their rankings are abysmal. There really is no difference.
Are we really prepared to say Garcia was historys champion over Pacquiao, because he held the WBC? No, of course not.
Nowadays, the fighter makes the title.
So in order, it would look like this:
WBC - Wilder / WBO - Parker
IBF Joshua
WBA / Ring / Lineal - Vacant
I can't differentiate between a Stiverne win, or Ruiz & Takam. There are non champions like Klitschko and Pulev who rank higher than the champions.
The winner of Joshua/Klitschko for the WBA/IBF will have the most legitimate championship, however.
Comment