Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why does GGG always get credit for imaginary wins???

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by TonyGe View Post
    On the flip side why do some people claim Canelo would beat everyone on Golovkin's resume ? Because they are fans of Canelo and the other group are fans of Golovkin. Nobody knows unless it actually happens. Just ask Joshua how that works.



    which one of the scrubs on G's resume, could have beaten Canelo?

    name him..... ?

    this will be funny

    name him, Tony Baloney !!

    FACT: the best win on Golovkin's resume was a HUGE underdog

    think about that

    Comment


    • #12
      To be fair GGG really did win the first fight with Canelo. I thought he lost the second one but he def won the first one. Not super big fan of either but it wouldn’t be right to act like that didn’t happen

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by _Maxi View Post
        Wow, they let you out of prison? It's been like a month.
        I'm too cute to be in prison

        Comment


        • #14
          GGG resume ain’t bad. Ppl trolling

          GGG resume like RJJ. They was KO’ng MF’ers out. Available opponents perhaps weren’t it’s best but s*** I give both credit. Perhaps they had power and made it look easy

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
            on the other thread..... Boxing1013 just stated that he does not see any real difference between Golovkin beating Murray and Lemieux, and Canelo beating Cotto and Lara

            then..... he said that some of the killers on Golovkin's resume could have beaten Canelo..... but he will not name which one
            Canelo beat Cotto - by the skin of his teeth - because he was 20lb bigger than him in the ring. He beat Lara because Lara is a runner, not a fighter.

            GGG beat Lemieux and Murray at 160lbs. At 160 lbs the Murray who GGG beat would have beaten Cotto and stunk the place out as bad as Canelo did against Lara.

            Comment


            • #16
              They love the salty taste Canelo leaves in there mouth.

              Comment


              • #17
                What's hilarious is it's not just Golovkin they give his opponents credit for imaginary wins.

                Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                Canelo beat Cotto - by the skin of his teeth - because he was 20lb bigger than him in the ring. He beat Lara because Lara is a runner, not a fighter.

                GGG beat Lemieux and Murray at 160lbs. At 160 lbs the Murray who GGG beat would have beaten Cotto and stunk the place out as bad as Canelo did against Lara.
                Like this right here. His resume is so pathetic. Golovkin is a fantasy fighter, nothing more. The Golovkin his fans talk about, doesn't exist.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by larryxxx.. View Post
                  Because his resume is trash
                  A record 20 successful middleweight title defenses in a row and 22 KOs in a row is an excellent record. Nobody fighting today can match it in any weight class. He knocked out Lemieux,Macklin, Murray, Geale, and many other guys rated top 10 by ring at the time he fought them. Haters like you turn these top 10 world rated challengers into bums as soon as he knocks them out. Your favorite Canelo does not have such a great record. He had a couple of good wins as 154 pound champ and a lot of cherry picks far worse than the worse guy GGG ever fought as middleweight champion. He won the title by beating Hatton's lousy brother, a welterweight at a catch weight, He cherry picked unranked little guys like Gomez and Lopez and defended against old welterweight Mosley. Yet you go on and on about Canelo's great resume while calling GGG's resume garbage. You are bias as hell and it shows. No matter who GGG beats you give him zero credit. GGG beats Jacobs and gets no credit. Canelo fights Jacobs later and he is this fearless warrior for doing what GGG already did. What a bunch of BS.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by boliodogs View Post
                    A record 20 successful middleweight title defenses in a row and 22 KOs in a row is an excellent record. Nobody fighting today can match it in any weight class. He knocked out Lemieux,Macklin, Murray, Geale, and many other guys rated top 10 by ring at the time he fought them. Haters like you turn these top 10 world rated challengers into bums as soon as he knocks them out. Your favorite Canelo does not have such a great record. He had a couple of good wins as 154 pound champ and a lot of cherry picks far worse than the worse guy GGG ever fought as middleweight champion. He won the title by beating Hatton's lousy brother, a welterweight at a catch weight, He cherry picked unranked little guys like Gomez and Lopez and defended against old welterweight Mosley. Yet you go on and on about Canelo's great resume while calling GGG's resume garbage. You are bias as hell and it shows. No matter who GGG beats you give him zero credit. GGG beats Jacobs and gets no credit. Canelo fights Jacobs later and he is this fearless warrior for doing what GGG already did. What a bunch of BS.
                    ^^^Boxingscenes most boring poster.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Why doesn't Alvarez get more credit for moving up to fight Fielding? Sure Rocky was unknown and a +800 underdog, but the dude was tall.
                      Same thing goes for Chavez Jr. Damm Jr had fought as high as 175lbs. Yeah people say he looked dead at 164, but he still had that big frame.
                      Saul just don't get no credit for taking those big risks.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP