Floyd ruined daggum's life
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why Floyd envies Lomachenko
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by DeadLikeMe View PostFloyd ruined daggum's life
im just trying to find out how you can become the best of your era by not fighting? would leonard be the best of his era if he didn't fight hearns, duran, benitez, and hagler. would ali if he didnt fight liston, foreman, and frazier? if they stayed undefeated i guess so. what high standards.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by daggum View Posthow can floyd be the best fighter of his era if he never fought the other best guys in his era? well until they were over the hill that is but in their primes i mean. it makes no sense. there is just no high quality substance to that resume. lots of solid wins but he didnt prove he was the best. he had the chance against cotto, marg and pac and he didnt want to make the fights and hes the best? pacs resume is much better than his so how can floyd be better? he beat him head to head? well are floyd and jeff horn co best of the eras? is this now the jeff horn era?
Floyd is the best since RJJ, and Loma is the best since Floyd - although Loma has the chance to surpass them with the rest of his career.
I didn't like Floyd, and still don't. That doesn't mean I'm looking for excuses to diminish his ability.
Comment
-
Originally posted by THEFRESHBRAWLER View PostOk so what prime fighters has he beat? Jason Sosa and Nicholas Walters lmaoo. You’re hanging your hat on a prime Nicholas Walters? Like I said the bar is extremely low
for Loma
You made the argument which is a very stupid one. Rigo was 37 so he’s definitely not prime lol. You have no argument. He’ll never be nowhere near Floyd. Only thing he has is his amateur career that no1 gives a dàmn about. A retired Floyd is still 100x more popular than Lomachenco. He’ll be lucky to even be mentioned amongst Floyd. He can’t be on track to surpass it if he already has one loss to a guy with almost 15 losses lmaoo. Think before you speak son.
Comment
-
Might upset some posters but however good Floyd was a pro, he got found out in the amateurs and wasnt good enough to win a medal whereas lomachenko was near on invincible, 396-1.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DramaShow View PostMight upset some posters but however good Floyd was a pro, he got found out in the amateurs and wasnt good enough to win a medal whereas lomachenko was near on invincible, 396-1.
What is funny though, is how the haters can't even leave it at that - they try to say that Loma's amateur record is fake.
Of course, watching a guy turn pro, win multiple belts within his first ten fights and enter the top 10 P4P lists, and be Ring magazine fighter of the year all so quickly does nothing to suggest that his amateur record is inaccurate.
A lot of people want to hate on Loma, or discredit him. It is like Loma's excellence is a threat to their personal favourite boxers, or the reputation of legacy of their favourite boxers, so they feel a need to tear Loma down.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DramaShow View PostMight upset some posters but however good Floyd was a pro, he got found out in the amateurs and wasnt good enough to win a medal whereas lomachenko was near on invincible, 396-1.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
Comment
-
Floyd Mayweather at 29 y.o.:
record 37-0-0
4 division champion, 5 belts
3 PPV fights
highest purse - 8 million (vs Baldomir)
Ring Magazine P4P #1 (at 28 y.o)
The Ring Magazine Titles - World Lightweight Title (2002-2004), World Welterweight Title (2006-)
The Ring Magazine Fighter of the Year (1998, 2007)
Lomachenko at 29 y.o:
record 10-1-0
2 division champion 2 belts
0 PPV fights
highest purse - 1.2 million
Ring Magazine P4P #3 (at 29 y.o)
The Ring Magazine Titles - 0
The Ring Magazine Fighter of the Year (2017)
Comment
-
Comment