Egyptian Mummified DNA Shows Ancestry Akin to the Middle East

[JimRaynor]

"during Egypt’s New Kingdom, and AD 425, in the Roman era"

Stopped reading after this

All you need to see

If Egyptian Hieroglyphs go back to 3500 BC, why is OP using DNA from 425 AD?

have fun white washing history

Did you also stop reading after

"The study, published on 30 May in Nature Communications1, includes data from 90 mummies buried between 1380 bc, during Egypt’s New Kingdom, and ad 425"

You know 1380, around the same time your prized queen TIYE ruled.

[Elroy The Great]

What was the point of putting me on ignore when your dumbas$ was going to post in my thread anyways?

And what the hell is this BS THE DAILY MONITOR?

the dumb bltch is salty like that. gets owned and then gets iggy. he also doesnt have the confidence to tell me what shlthole hes from (even though i have an idea).

in the end, bfd if the africans/egyptians at one point (A LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG ASSED TIME AGO) managed to rule a portion of the world

look at them NOW.

[Chollo Vista]

Did you also stop reading after

"The study, published on 30 May in Nature Communications1, includes data from 90 mummies buried between 1380 bc, during Egypt’s New Kingdom, and ad 425"

You know 1380, around the same time your prized queen TIYE ruled.

How many mummies taken from 1380 BC? And even going off that, the pictures depicting black Egyptians start at 3500 BC which is 2000 years before the earliest dated mummy this study was done on..

And how many of these mummies were extracted from 425 AD? Do you know?

What history tells us as fact is that Egyptians migrated from East Africa; specifically Ethiopia... You posting something that was extracted from a mummy in 425 AD is rather pointless at that point.

http://www.monitor.co.ug/artsculture...9/-/index.html


In December 2012, DNA tests were conducted on the mummies of Pharaoh Rameses III and his son, which proved that they belonged to human Y chromosome group E1b1a. This is the Y chromosome group of Sub Saharan Africans who speak Niger–Congo languages. The disclosed Y chromosome group of the Pharaoh, at the time of releasing the report, was considered as just one of the details to make the investigation scientifically solid with facts. But its revelation caused a stir equal to the purpose of the original forensic investigation.
Another group of mummies from the Amarna period of Egyptian pharaohs were tested by DNA Tribes, an American Company which specialises in conducting DNA tests, in 2013.
The conclusion of the tests were that the mummies autosomal profiles would be most frequent in the present day populations of the African Great Lakes region and Southern Africa. Subsequent analysis of the autosomal profile of the mummy of Pharaoh Rameses III also concluded that this matched the genetic profiles of the population of the Great Lakes region as well.

[John Barron]

hmm what i want to know is what are afrocentrics getting out of this? reparations from the Egyptian government? ain't happening. perhaps they'll have better luck with the cucked Swedish government since dey wuz vikangz as well.

[Elroy The Great]

''YES ! MY PEOPLES RAN SHlT WAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyy yyyyyy BACK IN THE DAY !!!!''

thats called desperately reaching for glory

[JimRaynor]

How many mummies taken from 1380 BC? And even going off that, the pictures depicting black Egyptians start at 3500 BC which is 2000 years before the earliest dated mummy this study was done on..

And how many of these mummies were extracted from 425 AD? Do you know?

What history tells us as fact is that Egyptians migrated from East Africa; specifically Ethiopia... You posting something that was extracted from a mummy in 425 AD is rather pointless at that point.

http://www.monitor.co.ug/artsculture...9/-/index.html


In December 2012, DNA tests were conducted on the mummies of Pharaoh Rameses III and his son, which proved that they belonged to human Y chromosome group E1b1a. This is the Y chromosome group of Sub Saharan Africans who speak Niger–Congo languages. The disclosed Y chromosome group of the Pharaoh, at the time of releasing the report, was considered as just one of the details to make the investigation scientifically solid with facts. But its revelation caused a stir equal to the purpose of the original forensic investigation.
Another group of mummies from the Amarna period of Egyptian pharaohs were tested by DNA Tribes, an American Company which specialises in conducting DNA tests, in 2013.
The conclusion of the tests were that the mummies autosomal profiles would be most frequent in the present day populations of the African Great Lakes region and Southern Africa. Subsequent analysis of the autosomal profile of the mummy of Pharaoh Rameses III also concluded that this matched the genetic profiles of the population of the Great Lakes region as well.

Here is the simple truth, the vast majority of all the Egyptian DNA resembles that of the Middle East. Only about 8% is African DNA, and that came from Central Africa in the past 1500 years. If your theories were true, Egyptians would have far more African DNA, the sad truth is they don't.

The researchers say that there was probably a pulse of sub-Saharan African DNA into Egypt roughly 700 years ago. The mixing of ancient Egyptians and Africans from further south means that modern Egyptians can trace 8% more of their ancestry to sub-Saharan Africans than can the mummies from Abusir el-Meleq.

https://www.nature.com/news/mummy-dn...cestry-1.22069

I enjoy your threads, I wish you'd take me off ignore so I can contribute to them, what fun is it just arguing with yourself?

[Chollo Vista]

Here is the simple truth, the vast majority of all the Egyptian DNA resembles that of the Middle East. Only about 8% is African DNA, and that came from Central Africa in the past 1500 years. If your theories were true, Egyptians would have far more African DNA, the sad truth is they don't.

The researchers say that there was probably a pulse of sub-Saharan African DNA into Egypt roughly 700 years ago. The mixing of ancient Egyptians and Africans from further south means that modern Egyptians can trace 8% more of their ancestry to sub-Saharan Africans than can the mummies from Abusir el-Meleq.

https://www.nature.com/news/mummy-dn...cestry-1.22069

I enjoy your threads, I wish you'd take me off ignore so I can contribute to them, what fun is it just arguing with yourself?

Not even all the information is provided in the article. How many mummies were extracted from 425 AD? What % of the mummies were shown to be Middle Eastern?

Since when do you have Black Europeans in 3500 BC?

It's documented that Egyptians traveled to parts of the Middle East before 1300 BC. Could this be the outcome?

How can Egyptians come from Ethiopia and be considered Arab?

This has white supremacy written all over it

Again,

http://www.monitor.co.ug/artsculture...9/-/index.html
In December 2012, DNA tests were conducted on the mummies of Pharaoh Rameses III and his son, which proved that they belonged to human Y chromosome group E1b1a. This is the Y chromosome group of Sub Saharan Africans who speak Niger–Congo languages. The disclosed Y chromosome group of the Pharaoh, at the time of releasing the report, was considered as just one of the details to make the investigation scientifically solid with facts. But its revelation caused a stir equal to the purpose of the original forensic investigation.
Another group of mummies from the Amarna period of Egyptian pharaohs were tested by DNA Tribes, an American Company which specialises in conducting DNA tests, in 2013.
The conclusion of the tests were that the mummies autosomal profiles would be most frequent in the present day populations of the African Great Lakes region and Southern Africa. Subsequent analysis of the autosomal profile of the mummy of Pharaoh Rameses III also concluded that this matched the genetic profiles of the population of the Great Lakes region as well.

[megas30]

The study, published on 30 May in Nature Communications1, includes data from 90 mummies buried between 1380 bc, during Egypt’s New Kingdom, and ad 425, in the Roman era. The findings show that the mummies’ closest kin were ancient farmers from a region that includes present-day Israel and Jordan. Modern Egyptians, by contrast, have inherited more of their DNA from central Africans.

Archaeological discoveries and historical documents suggest close ties between Egypt and the Middle East, but “it is very nice that this study has now provided empirical evidence for this at the genetic level”, says evolutionary anthropologist Omer Gokcumen of the State University of New York at Buffalo.

https://www.nature.com/news/mummy-dn...cestry-1.22069


Sorry to disappoint the We Wuz Kangz crowd, ie Chollo who got so upset at this revealing news that he decided to put me on ignore.

Here you go Chollo, I thought you should know this first hand, the truth will set you free my friend!


Looks like the most African DNA the Egyptians have, came pretty recently in the past 1500 years from Central Africa.

This was posted before and beaten to death. Those periods you listed are from the subsequent invasions and conquests period. Why are you guys always excited to post these misleading claims? Also, from 1350BC to 420BC doesn't mean all the mummies are foreigners, but rather that the ones they found fall within that range.

[ΣNΣMY]

hmm what i want to know is what are afrocentrics getting out of this? reparations from the Egyptian government? ain't happening. perhaps they'll have better luck with the cucked Swedish government since dey wuz vikangz as well.

People like Chollo feel inferior. You can look around and see what white men have done, so to feel important in history and, to world people like Chollo make up these fantasies.

[Commie]

Afro Americans claiming egyptian ancestry is like an israeli claiming nazi ancestry