Obviously any fighter should get the max they can get in this dangerous sport & obviously a promoter/network is going to lean towards paying them as lil as they can while making them feel they are getting a fair enough value to sign with them.
But if you were to come up with a formula, on average, on what a fighters true value should be using their popularity among hardcore fans, popularity among casual fans, gate revenue, TV ratings, entertainment value out of the ring, entertainment value in the ring, weight division, depth of division, long term potential or any other factors you think are important what would it look like in order of importance or in any other way you wish to describe/list it.
But if you were to come up with a formula, on average, on what a fighters true value should be using their popularity among hardcore fans, popularity among casual fans, gate revenue, TV ratings, entertainment value out of the ring, entertainment value in the ring, weight division, depth of division, long term potential or any other factors you think are important what would it look like in order of importance or in any other way you wish to describe/list it.
Comment