Honestly, is there anyone in here who doesn't see SRR as the GOAT?

[WhoreUs]

Robinson has a head to head win over Armstrong, Robinson won a 10 round UD.

man , ray had like 6 inches on henry.

plus it was near the end of henry's career.

henry was like 30 something already. in those days that was old for boxing.

[flipbjefrox]

I don't have to.

The history books can effortlessly back me up on the claim.

Its called a consensus.

I'm still waiting for you to uncontrollably declare Packy the GOAT.

Come on *******, you know you want to...

So it's true Jack D ****** is a pretender Making a thread like this doesnt change the fact that you're an idiot. Next time you see an article on Max boxing saying _____ is the greatest, you'll create another thread

[JACK D. RIPPER]

flipbjefrox[/B];5828815]Did any of you know tha Jack D ****** is making proclamation without having seen any of SRR fights?

I was gonna try to make fun of your name, but its impossible to since it sucks so bad as you created it.

Wtf is a "flipbjefrox"???

[JAB5239]

[QUOTE=joseph5620;5828766]

LOL no I like Pac. I'm just saying in those days there were no catch weights and that has to count for something if you're going to rate fighters based on accomlishments.

There were less weights, less titles and more fighters which equals tougher competition.

[JACK D. RIPPER]

So it's true Jack D ****** is a pretender Making a thread like this doesnt change the fact that you're an idiot. Next time you see an article on Max boxing saying _____ is the greatest, you'll create another thread

Nope. Only because it was SRR. And it already confirmed what I knew.

Sorry *******.

See the sig.

[flipbjefrox]

It's funny that one can make a proclamation after reading an article

[joseph5620]

so he wasn't in his prime when he fought at middleweight?


Hell no he wasn't in his prime.

so his losses at middleweight don't count right?

Obviously they count. They are on his record. But his Middleweight career was not his prime. Do you realize how many fights Robinson had by the time he fought for the title at 160?


good. i'll apply the same thing for tito then.

tito was unbeatable in his prime! hopkins only beat a past prime tito at middleweight!




Robinson's number of fights whjen he fought for 160 crown: 120-1-2

Tito's record vs Hopkins: 40-0

Dumb comparison.


and wtf does pacquiao have to do with any of this? stupid fuck. no one's talking about pacquiao.

I had to throw him in since you're always on his nuts

[street bully]

lol u r right. he hasn't

and Street Bully's posts are even less informative. The guy can't explain why he believes what he believes

First of all you are a groupie. Second of all your named Cottofanatic, and thirdlly, are you saying I can not have a particular opion based on what I have seen from what is available, and read in detail just because I was no present during a specific era.

With that logic I shouldn't take the historians word about the Ottoman and Roman empires right, since there is no video footage.

[flipbjefrox]

I was gonna try to make fun of your name, but its impossible to since it sucks so bad as you created it.

Wtf is a "flipbjefrox"???

Awww ******o is too stupid to come up with an idea of his own well max boxing cant help you out this time right?

[WhoreUs]

I had to throw him in since you're always on his nuts

tito could have been 130-0 at 147 if he fought a dozen times a year.

just stay away from oscar.