Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hearn: I Want To Know This Week If Wilder Wants The Fight

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Laligalaliga View Post
    realistically, wilder knows he cannot get 40%. He is not a that position to make such request, his resume and drawing power is still on a low. He is more interested in fighting breazeale.
    That fight is signed and sealed. They are waiting for AJ/podvetkin to announce first.
    You're posting blatant lies. Things you couldn't even possibly know. Stop allowing Hearn to brainwash you. Wilder vs. Breazeale is the back up plan for Wilder's next fight if AJ won't fight him, but nothing is signed or sealed. Nor does Wilder prefer that fight. You're just parroting things Hearn completely made up.

    Parker got 33% and brings much much less to the table than Wilder. Wilder at a minimum is worth 38% if Parker was worth 33%. Considering AJ is the reason the fight won't be able to maximize the revenue, Wilder should be given some consideration for agreeing to go to the UK when the fight will generate so much less there. AJ was already given the 50 million he wanted. Not Wilder's fault he changed his mind. If UK is so important to AJ, then 60/40 becomes reasonable because AJ is the one insisting that both of them make less money.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
      You're posting blatant lies. Things you couldn't even possibly know. Stop allowing Hearn to brainwash you. Wilder vs. Breazeale is the back up plan for Wilder's next fight if AJ won't fight him, but nothing is signed or sealed. Nor does Wilder prefer that fight. You're just parroting things Hearn completely made up.

      Parker got 33% and brings much much less to the table than Wilder. Wilder at a minimum is worth 38% if Parker was worth 33%. Considering AJ is the reason the fight won't be able to maximize the revenue, Wilder should be given some consideration for agreeing to go to the UK when the fight will generate so much less there. AJ was already given the 50 million he wanted. Not Wilder's fault he changed his mind. If UK is so important to AJ, then 60/40 becomes reasonable because AJ is the one insisting that both of them make less money.
      it seems you now work with hearn to conclude Parker got 33%. Hearn himself said its not true, Parker got less.
      Beside, the A side have giving their conditions for the fight to be made, it's left for the B side to either accept, renegotiate or walk away.
      Floyd did more what AJ is doing and you guys were very much in support of him. Is it because AJ is Brit's and the HW has moved to the UK?
      Wilder breazeale is signed and sealed in case you don't know.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Laligalaliga View Post
        Wilder breazeale is signed and sealed in case you don't know.
        Breazeale has been acting like that has been the case for almost a month now. He says that he is preparing for that fight.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Laligalaliga View Post
          it seems you now work with hearn to conclude Parker got 33%. Hearn himself said its not true, Parker got less.
          Hearn is lying. You are a fan. You have no way of knowing what the truth is.


          Beside, the A side have giving their conditions for the fight to be made, it's left for the B side to either accept, renegotiate or walk away.
          AJ's conditions for the fight to be made were for him to be guaranteed 50 million. His conditions were met. Now he's refusing to honor his conditions.


          Wilder breazeale is signed and sealed in case you don't know.
          Hearn is lying. You are a fan. You have no way of knowing what the truth is.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post




            Hearn is lying. You are a fan. You have no way of knowing what the truth is.
            You do know you cant keep using this as a rebuttal for everything in a veiled and chest-puffing way of saying you're right, without actually offering a valid reason or piece of real evidence to support that claim?

            Saying someone is a hearn "fan" and that he is lying, doesnt make what you say any less disingenuous when you cant actually refute the claim.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by JRB123 View Post
              Breazeale has been acting like that has been the case for almost a month now. He says that he is preparing for that fight.
              I have known that for a while. only wilder fans girls are still expecting 40%, even wilder himself has moved on.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
                Hearn is lying. You are a fan. You have no way of knowing what the truth is.




                AJ's conditions for the fight to be made were for him to be guaranteed 50 million. His conditions were met. Now he's refusing to honor his conditions.




                Hearn is lying. You are a fan. You have no way of knowing what the truth is.
                I guess you are a co promoter, thats how you knew.

                That's why he is the A side, he worked hard to attain that status. He can decide to change the conditions again, if it's not good for the B side, he can walk away which he has already done.
                Looking up to Azj/podvetkin in Cardiff.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
                  Hearn is lying. You are a fan. You have no way of knowing what the truth is.




                  AJ's conditions for the fight to be made were for him to be guaranteed 50 million. His conditions were met. Now he's refusing to honor his conditions.




                  Hearn is lying. You are a fan. You have no way of knowing what the truth is.
                  Conditions are DETAILS its NOT a set amount of "here you go now lets fight " ______

                  No details were given , a 24 hr deadline was though to Joshua s response which was a split IF it were a 100 Million generated fight . So you are just twisting facts as usual anyway . lol


                  Parkers 33 % was 6 /7 Million .


                  If you cant figure out 40 % for DIFFERENT fight is not going to be the same then your an idiot.


                  If you cant figure out and calculate based on a fighters combined purse and NEVER being on PPV ( then its GUESS work ) that Wilder is over pricing himself at 40% which IS 20 /plus Million then you have no business sense and shouldn't even talking like you know what you're talking about !




                  And am i actually reading this right ?

                  " If UK is so important to AJ, then 60/40 becomes reasonable "

                  Are you suggesting Wilder should get 60 % as reasonable , which is estimated around 30 Million up from a 2.1 Million highest pay ?


                  Last edited by juggernaut666; 06-06-2018, 11:45 AM.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Laligalaliga View Post
                    That's why he is the A side, he worked hard to attain that status. He can decide to change the conditions again, if it's not good for the B side, he can walk away which he has already done.
                    Think about how stupid your position is. You're claiming Wilder vs Breazeale is a done deal and signed and that Wilder walked away from AJ.

                    Meanwhile, AJ's promoter himself is saying negotiations are on going, the two sides just had another meeting, etc.

                    Why would AJ's promoter be wasting his time negotiating, continuing to have meetings, etc, if Wilder is already committed to fighting Breazeale and unable to fight AJ? Think about that for a second. Are you saying Eddie & Barry Hearn are giant idiots and wasting their time trying to make a fight they know is contractually impossible?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by yammy25 View Post
                      You do know you cant keep using this as a rebuttal for everything in a veiled and chest-puffing way of saying you're right, without actually offering a valid reason or piece of real evidence to support that claim?

                      Saying someone is a hearn "fan" and that he is lying, doesnt make what you say any less disingenuous when you cant actually refute the claim.
                      If a fan is parroting a Hearn IFL statement as irrefutable fact, when that fan has absolutely no way of knowing what's true and what isn't, then yes I can keep using the same rebuttal.

                      Just because Hearn said Wilder already signed to fight Breazeale doesn't mean it's true and a fan that has no idea if it's true shouldn't be repeating it as verified fact.

                      Especially when Hearn's own actions show he was lying because why would Matchroom still be negotiating and meeting with Wilder's side if they already know that Wilder signed to fight someone else and can't fight AJ? Think about it. It's two totally conflicting stories. Hearn has to be lying.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP