AOC Accuses Nancy Pelosi Of Being Racist.

[Lomadeaux]

Yes dude we know. You’re tough. You make big money. You’d do this and you’d do that. You are the classic internet tough guy.

You’re just a worthless piece of trash that hides behind the safety of the internet to spew garbage. There are a million like you cowardly in real life , warrior king on the internet.

Dunn, you're a fat lazy victim. There's nothing about me that understands anything about how people like you are created. I don't understand it, nor do I desire to.

[Lomadeaux]

Here is the quote . He didn’t say supposedly as you claimed. So as usual you are proven to be the illiterate.

In your daily life you are emasculated daily so you come on the internet to feel like a man.

You’d never talk to anyone like this in real life. But the internet gives you comfort because of the anonymity. This is the very worst thing about the internet- feeble weak losers like yourself get to pretend you are something you are not.

Like most of your kind you are only a man when you are in front of a computer screen.

Dunn... You're fat and lazy and stupid. Why would a fighter not talk to anybody who says dumb **** however he wanted?

You'd get that ass whipped acting the way you do around real men.

Go complain about white people you racist ****.

[The Big Dunn]

I'm pro-abortion, I was fanatically opposed to invading Iraq, I've never cared either way about gay marriage (and see it as a diversionary issue), I oversaw crowdfunding projects for female-owned african businesses in university, I believe in man-made climate change, etc.

I'm considered "far-right" purely for rejecting the extreme racial rhetoric & "white supremacy" conspiracy theory of the modern left. That's it.

(And I own guns, but if I owned guns and accepted the left's extreme racial rhetoric, then I would be called an "anti-fascist").

The DNC is approaching the theoretical maximum on the right/left paradigm. The Republican mean has barely moved from the center in 20+ years. This isn't a matter of opinion but of a tracking methodology over time (Pew):



When I ask about their solutions to environmental problems? "Climate change is an engineered weapon of white supremacy".

Foreign policy? "Force the white supremacists of Europe to accept a post-white future".

How do we protect free speech? "It's a codeword for white supremacy".

I'd like to see a piano concerto. "You wish you were white so badly don't you".

It's become a confederation of anti-white ethnonationalist groups with no other coherent political positions on any topic. None.

They are quite literally willing to burn the world economy down as long as it means hurting people whose eye and hair colors cause them sexual envy. It's enough to make you give up on humans in general.



I should have quoted "far-right". The US has no far-right on the federal level, but it gets so tiring trying to circumvent the word games.

If Trump, who would have had to run Democrat in the 1990s, is "far-right", then I'm "far-right", and I'd like them to know what drove me there.

You are a moderate republican/conservative that is seen as far right because you defend the extreme racial rhetoric of the right. As the party became ultra conservative you moved with it, yet blame that move on the other side.

People see you as far right because you eschew what you claim to be your principles/values and align yourself with the political right. You claiming this is why you abandoned it doesn't make any sense. If you are pro-abortion, how do you align yourself with a party that has such extreme views on the subject? If you are against climate change, how do you align yourself with a party that denies it? You are are against invading Iraq yet the party is setting up the framework for war with Iran.

Worse, you even lie and overexaggerate about those responses. Yes, maybe an individual gave you those responses, that in no way means it is the platform of the party.

Yes, the Democratic party is changing. It is opening up to diverse groups and they bring with them different issues. Parties have always gone through this type of change when you open doors. The same party struggled with Blue Dog dems when they allowed African Americans under the tent.

[////]

You are a moderate republican/conservative that is seen as far right because you defend the extreme racial rhetoric of the right. As the party became ultra conservative you moved with it, yet blame that move on the other side.

People see you as far right because you eschew what you claim to be your principles/values and align yourself with the political right. You claiming this is why you abandoned it doesn't make any sense. If you are pro-abortion, how do you align yourself with a party that has such extreme views on the subject? If you are against climate change, how do you align yourself with a party that denies it? You are are against invading Iraq yet the party is setting up the framework for war with Iran.

Worse, you even lie and overexaggerate about those responses. Yes, maybe an individual gave you those responses, that in no way means it is the platform of the party.

Yes, the Democratic party is changing. It is opening up to diverse groups and they bring with them different issues. Parties have always gone through this type of change when you open doors. The same party struggled with Blue Dog dems when they allowed African Americans under the tent.

According to the Pew data the mean Republican political position has hardly moved since the 1990s while the Democrat party mean has made a dramatic move to the extreme left of the spectrum.

The US does not have a true "right-wing" because it does not have a significant presence in that end of the spectrum. It does not have anything equivalent to the overtly ethnonationalist Japanese right, for example.

The US was historically divided between sub-sects of liberalism. It is now mainly a conflict between a moderate+liberal coalition (GOP) and a hard socialist+anti-white ethnonationalist coalition (DNC). You as an individual fall perfectly into the latter coalition, while comically denying they exist.

You yourself subscribe to the "white supremacy" conspiracy theory (as well as the "Russians" hoax, a lazy rebranding of the white supremacy conspiracy theory to shift the scapegoating over to Russia as the US becomes a white-minority country). You are accusing me of exaggerating the existence of such people while being one, no?

In regards to military policy: The Democrats have almost always been extremely interventionist. Their administrations account for most of the war declarations & troop escalations in US history. The parties temporarily switched places under the Bush admin (hence the term neo-cons), but they've since switched back to normal with the destruction of Libya, relentless Syrian invasion propaganda, sabotage of Trump's diplomat efforts towards Russia, etc.

[The Big Dunn]

According to the Pew data the mean Republican political position has hardly moved since the 1990s while the Democrat party mean has made a dramatic move to the extreme left of the spectrum.

The US does not have a true "right-wing" because it does not have a significant presence in that end of the spectrum. It does not have anything equivalent to the overtly ethnonationalist Japanese right, for example.

The US was historically divided between sub-sects of liberalism. It is now mainly a conflict between a moderate+liberal coalition (GOP) and a hard socialist+anti-white ethnonationalist coalition (DNC). You as an individual fall perfectly into the latter coalition, while comically denying they exist.

You yourself subscribe to the "white supremacy" conspiracy theory (as well as the "Russians" hoax, a lazy rebranding of the white supremacy conspiracy theory to shift the scapegoating over to Russia as the US becomes a white-minority country). You are accusing me of exaggerating the existence of such people while being one, no?

In regards to military policy: The Democrats have almost always been extremely interventionist. Their administrations account for most of the war declarations & troop escalations in US history. The parties temporarily switched places under the Bush admin (hence the term neo-cons), but they've since switched back to normal with the destruction of Libya, relentless Syrian invasion propaganda, sabotage of Trump's diplomat efforts towards Russia, etc.

Denying the existence of white supremacy is equivalent of denying climate change or saying the earth is flat.

Yes the Democratic Party has moved left. That has been in response to a republican party that is becoming more and more ****geneous, which is why the Pew statistic has stayed the same with regard to that party.

What I find interesting is the members of the party you defend so much would spit on you and call you a terrorist.

[JimRaynor]

Denying the existence of white supremacy is equivalent of denying climate change or saying the earth is flat.

Yes the Democratic Party has moved left. That has been in response to a republican party that is becoming more and more ****geneous, which is why the Pew statistic has stayed the same with regard to that party.

What I find interesting is the members of the party you defend so much would spit on you and call you a terrorist.

No we wouldn't, we accept ///// with open arms.

[The Big Dunn]

No we wouldn't, we accept ///// with open arms.

On the internet, yes. I believe you likely would so long as he expressed similar views regarding Trump.

Some of the other Trumpers on this board, in real life, not a chance.

Unless you think people like the ones that attended the rally in Charlottesville, VA would welcome him.

I will add this, many feel alienated by the Republican party because it has openly welcomed the white supremacist movement.

The Democratic Party made huge mistake by responding to that by developing policies that alienated white people, especially middle and working class white men.

[John Barron]

On the internet, yes. I believe you likely would so long as he expressed similar views regarding Trump.

Some of the other Trumpers on this board, in real life, not a chance.

Unless you think people like the ones that attended the rally in Charlottesville, VA would welcome him.

there's been hundreds of pro-trump rallies where black, brown, asian trump supporters have shown up without anything happening to them yet your dumbass is still stuck on Charlottesville. and also "people are more accepting on the internet" are you serious? is this really your argument?

[The Big Dunn]

there's been hundreds of pro-trump rallies where black, brown, asian trump supporters have shown up without anything happening to them yet your dumbass is still stuck on Charlottesville. and also "people are more accepting on the internet" are you serious? is this really your argument?

There have been hundreds of Trump rallies where there have been as well, so stop playing dumb. Just the other day Trump in a hissy fit tweeted at 3 American Congresspeople to "go back where they came from" simply because they disagree with him and are not white.

Often the Trump rallies desperately find one or 2 people of color and position them on camera to make it look like the party is diverse.

Guys like you act one way when someone agrees with you on the internet and a completely different way when you see them in public.

[JimRaynor]

On the internet, yes. I believe you likely would so long as he expressed similar views regarding Trump.

Some of the other Trumpers on this board, in real life, not a chance.

Unless you think people like the ones that attended the rally in Charlottesville, VA would welcome him.

I will add this, many feel alienated by the Republican party because it has openly welcomed the white supremacist movement.

The Democratic Party made huge mistake by responding to that by developing policies that alienated white people, especially middle and working class white men.

People in Charlottesville were white nationalists who have largely denounced Trump nowadays.

All of this red is not white nationalists.


The people in your home state voting red are also not white nationalists.



When you guys regain your senses about right and wrong, science, practicality, and capitalism then we welcome you with open arms.