Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

OFFICIAL: Donald Trump thread.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The meeting is off. Trump once again jumped the gun and thought this was an exclusive personal invitation to him. This invitation has been extended to all U.S. Presidents since Clinton and all have agreed to meet as long as certain conditions are met before the meeting. N. Korea has never agreed to those conditions that's why no U.S. President has met with N. Korea since the invitation has been extended. Once this was explained to Trump the White House went back to the same policy other President's have set.

    Donald Trump snared headlines across the world by announcing yesterday he would meet with North Korea, breaking with years of American policy that held such a meeting could only happen if North Korea made concessions on its nuclear program first. It turns out Trump’s foreign policy masterstroke did not come as the result of a Metternichtian calculation but instead a completely spontaneous outburst.

    South Korean official Chung Eui-yong was in the White House yesterday meeting with other officials. Trump decided to see Chung right away; maybe Fox News was in repeats or something. Trump “then asked Mr. Chung to tell him about his meeting with Mr. Kim,” reports the New York Times. “When Mr. Chung said that the North Korean leader had expressed a desire to meet Mr. Trump, the president immediately said he would do it, and directed Mr. Chung to announce it to the White House press corps.”

    It sounds from this account that Trump had no real idea that North Korea has always wanted a face-to-face meeting with the U.S. president, and the U.S. has always imposed conditions. That would certainly be the logical interpretation of this account, given that, in the last week, Trump has confused North Korea with the other, extremely different South Korea, and demanded a laughably tiny $1 billion trade concession from China when he was supposed to demand $100 billion. It certainly appears Trump believed, in the moment, that North Korea had not been interested in a meeting until then, so he needed to take the deal before they changed their mind. Whatever. Art of the Deal.

    So then the administration rushed out its breakthrough announcement. But now the administration has to slowly back away without quite acknowledging it is doing so. Press Secretary Sarah Sanders told reporters today Trump won’t meet with North Korea unless they offer concrete concessions beforehand:

    Of course, that’s the old policy. Which means Trump shot off his mouth and got excited and then his advisers had to explain to him why he can’t do that. Or maybe they haven’t explained it to him and are backing out without his permission. Whatever the explanation, the major policy change Trump announced appears to be completely moot because he plays the president on television but isn’t really president.
    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer...-babbling.html

    Comment


    • Trumps negotiating from a position of power doe! Lol dumb asz mark

      Comment


      • Putin telling Trump he dont give a flying ****

        Russian President Vladimir Putin has told NBC News that he "couldn't care less" if Russian citizens tried to interfere in the 2016 American presidential election because, he claims, they were not connected to the Kremlin.

        In an exclusive and at-times combative interview with NBC's Megyn Kelly, Putin again denied the charge by U.S. intelligence services that he ordered meddling in the November 2016 vote that put Donald Trump in the White House.

        "Why have you decided the Russian authorities, myself included, gave anybody permission to do this?" asked Putin, who will probably be returned as president in the March 18 elections.

        Putin was unmoved by an indictment filed by special counsel Robert Mueller last month that accused 13 Russian nationals and three Russian companies of interfering in the election — including supporting Trump's campaign and "disparaging" Hillary Clinton's.

        Mueller is investigating whether the Trump campaign colluded with the Kremlin.

        "So what if they're Russians?" Putin said of the people named in last month's indictment. "There are 146 million Russians. So what? ... I don't care. I couldn't care less. ... They do not represent the interests of the Russian state."

        Putin even suggested that Jews or other ethnic groups had been involved in the meddling.

        "Maybe they're not even Russians," he said. "Maybe they're Ukrainians, Tatars, Jews, just with Russian citizenship. Even that needs to be checked. Maybe they have dual citizenship. Or maybe a green card. Maybe it was the Americans who paid them for this work. How do you know? I don't know."

        Asked whether he was concerned about Russian citizens attacking U.S. democracy, Putin replied that he had yet to see any evidence that the alleged interference had broken Russian law.

        "We in Russia cannot prosecute anyone as long as they have not violated Russian law," he said. "At least send us a piece of paper. ... Give us a document. Give us an official request. And we'll take a look at it."

        U.S. intelligence agencies and many Western analysts have said that Russian interference came at the orders of the Kremlin. Putin, Russia's longest-serving leader since Stalin, dismissed this.

        "Could anyone really believe that Russia, thousands of miles away ... influenced the outcome of the election? Doesn't that sound ridiculous even to you?" he said. "It's not our goal to interfere. We do not see what goal we would accomplish by interfering. There's no goal."

        Experts like John Brennan, a former CIA director and now an NBC News analyst, say Moscow's goal was clear.

        "To weaken the United States government," Brennan said in a separate interview, summarizing his opinion of the Kremlin's aims. This, he added, was so "the U.S. government is not going to be able to deal with international issues and confronting Russian aggression as assertively as it needs to."

        Trump has called Putin "a strong leader" who has "done a very brilliant job in terms of what he represents and who he's representing."

        Trump has also hinted that he gives Putin the benefit of the doubt when he denies that Moscow interfered.

        "[Putin] said he absolutely did not meddle in our election. He did not do what they are saying he did," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One en route to Hanoi following a meeting with Putin on the sidelines of the APEC summit in Danang in November.

        In the interview with Kelly, Putin called the U.S. president "a businessman with vast experience" and "a quick study" despite being new to politics.

        "He understands that if it is necessary to establish a cooperative relationship with someone, then you have to treat your current or potential partner with respect," Putin said. "Engaging in mutual accusations and insults, this is a road to nowhere."

        Putin said he doesn't read Trump's tweets and doesn't tweet himself.

        Asked why not, he said: "I have other ways of expressing my point of view or implementing a decision. Donald is a more modern individual."

        Putin is facing little opposition in the presidential election whose first round is on March 18.

        "Well, we will see. It's up to the Russian voters," he said.

        In terms of the future of Russia-U.S. relations, he cast Russia as the victim.

        "We are not the ones who labeled you our enemies. You made a decision, at the level of parliament, at the level of Congress and put Russia on your list of enemies," he said. "Why did you do that? Are we the ones who imposed sanctions on the United States? The U.S. imposed sanctions on us."

        Putin claimed he would be willing to repair relations with Washington.

        "Listen, let's sit down calmly, talk and figure things out," he said. "I believe that the current president wants to do that, but there are forces that won't let him do it."
        https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/p...e-less-n855151

        Comment


        • Nunberg also told Palmeri he thought the Russian president was besting his former boss:

          “I think Vladimir Putin, if you look at it objectively, is really taking advantage of the president,” he said. “Vladimir Putin, I think we all can agree, wanted Donald Trump to win.”

          Palmeri finally asked Nunberg whether like Trump and many of his allies, he thinks the Mueller investigation is a “witch hunt.”

          “No I don’t think it’s a witch hunt,” Nunberg said. “There’s a lot of there, there. And that’s the sad truth.”

          “I don’t believe it leads to the president,” he added.
          Last edited by Motorcity Cobra; 03-10-2018, 10:40 AM.

          Comment


          • So easy to manipulate this man




            Former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) on Sunday said that it's no surprise that President Trump has been driven to push the conservative agenda, noting that the president “is not a complex man.”

            “The Japanese, for example, have figured out how to deal with President Trump. You compliment him, you flatter him, you work with him behind the scenes, you don’t take a stand against him publicly. There’s something to this,” CNN’s Jake Tapper said on "State of the Union."

            “Yeah, look, Donald Trump is not a complex man. I think that’s fairly certain,” Santorum said.
            Want to change Trump’s mind on policy? Be the last one who talks to him.

            https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nat...CIN/story.html

            Trump tends to echo the words of whomever last spoke to him, making direct access to him even more valuable, the people said, requesting anonymity to talk about internal campaign discussions.
            Inspired by Fox News, Trump contradicts his own administration’s official position on FISA

            While live-tweeting Fox & Friends on Thursday morning, President Trump expressed alarm that the House of Representatives may approve a bill reauthorizing the the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) — legislation that was used to surveil Trump campaign officials as part of the FBI’s investigation into possible collusion with Russia.




            Nebraska Republican Ben Sasse issued a statement rebuking those comments Wednesday night. “We’re not ditching any Constitutional protections simply because the last person the president talked to today doesn’t like them,” Sasse wrote.



            A former Navy sailor who pleaded guilty to a felony count of unauthorized possession and retention of national defense information for snapping photos on a nuclear attack submarine has received a pardon from President Donald Trump — and his attorney says Fox News deserves the credit.

            The legal team for Kristian Saucier compared his case to the handling of the investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server. That grabbed Trump’s interest, and it’s now paid off in the form of a presidential pardon, announced Friday.

            Last week, Saucier appeared on “Fox & Friends,” a program that the president records and watches during his morning “executive time.” Trump frequently sends tweets that correspond with segments on the morning show.

            Ronald Daigle, a lawyer hired to advocate for Saucier’s pardon, told HuffPost that Fox News played a key role in getting the case on Trump’s radar.

            “Absolutely,” Daigle said when asked whether going on Fox News was a big part of their strategy. “They were big supporters of Kris right from the beginning. They supported Kris.”

            In 2016, shortly after then-FBI Director James Comey announced the results of the Clinton email investigation, Saucier’s legal team began comparing the submariner’s case to Clinton’s. The Justice Department responded that Saucier was “grasping at highly imaginative and speculative straws,” but the case got Trump’s attention.

            Saucier was sentenced to a year behind bars prior to the 2016 election ― a sentence he completed before his pardon. One reason that federal prosecutors likely handled the case the way they did: Saucier destroyed a laptop, a camera and the camera’s memory card shortly after he was interviewed by the FBI. Pieces of a laptop were later found in the woods near a Saucier family home. Prosecutors tend to treat suspects more harshly when they are accused of destroying evidence.

            Since the election, Saucier’s team has “sent tons of marketing materials to the White House” and distributed press releases in an effort to “capture the president’s opinion,” Daigle said.

            Saucier’s team was aiming for a “political” pardon rather than a pardon that goes through the normal process of the Justice Department’s Office of the Pardon Attorney, Daigle said. Saucier was not yet eligible to go through that lengthy procedure.

            “I flipped the process around,” Daigle said. “We were doing something to try to capture the attention of the president. When we put the pardon in, we did a press release for that. When we heard back from the pardon office, we put a press release for that. Every step of the way, we’re trying to do what we can to be on the radar, and hopefully the president will hear us. We think he heard us more than once.”

            Daigle believes that Trump simply ordered that a pardon be prepared for his signature and that the Justice Department had very little involvement. A Justice Department spokesman declined to comment on its role in the pardon.

            Daigle’s pardon strategy isn’t going to work for defendants across the board, he said.

            “It’s not going to happen in every case. It just happened because we had a set of circumstances that were truly unjust,” said Daigle, referring to his argument that his client was prosecuted where others who committed similar offenses weren’t.

            Daigle said he and his client were “very excited” about the news. He said he hoped Saucier, who has a young child, would be able to get his military benefits back.

            “This would make a huge difference to his family if he can get his benefits back,” Daigle said. “This is a very talented young man, and he couldn’t find a job coming out for anything, only as a garbage collector. Now he’ll be able to go after these licenses and stuff to have a nice career on the outside.”

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Don Pichardo View Post
              Trumps negotiating from a position of power doe! Lol dumb asz mark

              Comment


              • Comment


                • Why would Trump need a back channel when he was already colluding?

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post
                    Fuk this site. I can’t green u for this.

                    ****z funny as hell.

                    Quid pro quo doe!

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali View Post
                      Idiot


                      Only reason you like obama was because you could leech some more.

                      You don’t pay for your housing
                      You don’t pay for your healthcare
                      You don’t contribute anything to society at all


                      Obama
                      “Keep your doctor” wrong
                      “Jobs ain’t coming back” wrong
                      “Isis jv squad”. Wrong
                      “Bengazhi was not a terror attack, but protest over YouTube video” wrong


                      You are a ****ing idiot....

                      Bytch mother****er wanna complain about trumps military service, what about Obama’s and yourself..

                      Coward ass loser, get your crippled ass off taxpayers dime.

                      Lying bytch
                      I thought bernie was a veteran

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP