I hate to burst you Trumpkins' bubble, but general election polls this far out mean absolutely nothing. Not even the overwhelming majority of polls which show Clinton absolutely obliterating the tangerine nightmare and beating him in historically deep red states like Utah, Tennessee, Georgia, and Arizona.
Trump is likely seeing a surge in his numbers after having essentially clinched the nomination (albeit not formally) and finally starting to have the party fall in line behind him. He's getting the presumptive nominee bump that every candidate gets once they basically clinch it. Whereas Clinton has yet to receive the same bump due to her still being primaried by Sanders. She'll likely receive a similar bump in numbers after June 7th once Sanders endorses her and Obama starts campaigning heavily for her.
Furthermore, this poll was conducted by FoxNews/GE, whose own polls have been all over the damn place for the last 6 months...
11/2015: Trump +5
12/2015: Clinton +11
1/2016: Trump +3
2/2016: Clinton +5
3/2016: Clinton +11
4/2016: Clinton +7
5/2016: Trump +3
...And that's with a +/- 4% margin of error for each candidate, which further underscores just how all over the place their numbers have been thus far.
This is a common general election myth. If independents decided elections then we would've had President Kerry and President Romney.
http://www.centerforpolitics.org/cry...voters-matter/
Elections are decided by demographics.
Trump is likely seeing a surge in his numbers after having essentially clinched the nomination (albeit not formally) and finally starting to have the party fall in line behind him. He's getting the presumptive nominee bump that every candidate gets once they basically clinch it. Whereas Clinton has yet to receive the same bump due to her still being primaried by Sanders. She'll likely receive a similar bump in numbers after June 7th once Sanders endorses her and Obama starts campaigning heavily for her.
Furthermore, this poll was conducted by FoxNews/GE, whose own polls have been all over the damn place for the last 6 months...
11/2015: Trump +5
12/2015: Clinton +11
1/2016: Trump +3
2/2016: Clinton +5
3/2016: Clinton +11
4/2016: Clinton +7
5/2016: Trump +3
...And that's with a +/- 4% margin of error for each candidate, which further underscores just how all over the place their numbers have been thus far.
Originally posted by Virgil Caine
View Post
http://www.centerforpolitics.org/cry...voters-matter/
Elections are decided by demographics.
Comment