Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ring Magazine's Greatest Lightweights

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ring Magazine's Greatest Lightweights

    In 2001
    1.Roberto Duran
    2.Benny Leonard
    3.Pernell Whitaker
    4.Joe Gans
    5.Ike Williams
    6.Joe Brown
    7.Carlos Ortiz
    8.Tony Canzoneri
    9.Bob Montgomery
    10.Beau Jack
    11.Lou Ambers
    12.Freddie Welsh
    13.Shane Mosley
    14.Henry Armstrong
    15.Esteban De Jesus
    16.Ken Buchanan
    17.Jack McAuliffe
    18.Ismael Laguna
    19.Ad Wolgast
    20.Oscar De La Hoya

  • #2
    Thats a fair list,in such a deep division opinions are bound too vary,but every list i have seen has the same 4 at the top,and rightly so imo

    Comment


    • #3
      Mosley above Armstrong!? Really?

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by The_Demon View Post
        Thats a fair list,in such a deep division opinions are bound too vary,but every list i have seen has the same 4 at the top,and rightly so imo
        You don't think an argument can be made for Canzoneri in the 4 spot instead of Pea?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Wild Blue Yonda View Post
          Mosley above Armstrong!? Really?

          Shane is HUGELY overrated at 135, in my opinion.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post

            Shane is HUGELY overrated at 135, in my opinion.
            I do feel it was his best weight, that he could've handled much better opposition than he did, & that he was a great test at 135lbs. for many great Lightweights --- but you may as well have Stevie Johnston above Henry Armstrong if you're going to place Shane Mosley on that manner of pedestal.

            As I say, I was impressed with Mosley as a LW, but his competition was quite ordinary, for the most part.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Wild Blue Yonda View Post
              I do feel it was his best weight, that he could've handled much better opposition than he did, & that he was a great test at 135lbs. for many great Lightweights --- but you may as well have Stevie Johnston above Henry Armstrong if you're going to place Shane Mosley on that manner of pedestal.

              As I say, I was impressed with Mosley as a LW, but his competition was quite ordinary, for the most part.
              I would have loved to see Shane fight at 140 before moving up to 147. Fights with Tszyu, Mitchell and Judah could have been classics! I agree lightweot was his best weight as is, at least his most dominant, though he really didn't fight anybody.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
                You don't think an argument can be made for Canzoneri in the 4 spot instead of Pea?
                Ye a case could be made come too think of it,but id still have Whitaker above him although canzoneri's strong resume makes it a close call

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post

                  Shane is HUGELY overrated at 135, in my opinion.
                  I agree with you on that.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    It's not too bad but why is Armstrong so low?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP