Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why does King get his own day and Washington and Lincoln has to share?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by MidnightSpecial View Post
    its ****ing stone roses 1 star everyone.


    btw what pisses me off most is that me being a white male i cant talk badly about Obama or im a racist....

    it doesnt have **** to do with his skin color... if McCain was doing the same **** i would be pissed off all the same.


    i never sided with bush either
    reported: racist

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by -veteran420- View Post
      so did many... but like all bs govt policies, it turned to **** and now we're worse off


      ****tards trying to manipulate things
      the goal was to get people who can't afford their own house a house.

      people bought houses they couldn't afford.

      it worked.



      i remember escrows faxing us over copies of 1003's when the buyers didn't fill out statement of informations.

      i would look at their income and look at deeds of trust for their loan and shake my head.

      but it wasn't our job to see who can afford what. the lenders were just too stupid and greedy.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by -veteran420- View Post
        were the slaves "free" while lincoln was in office???

        well....... it's the principle.

        slavery ended didn't it.

        it wouldn't have happened without lincoln.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Left Banned Tua View Post
          the goal was to get people who can't afford their own house a house.

          people bought houses they couldn't afford.

          it worked.



          i remember escrows faxing us over copies of 1003's when the buyers didn't fill out statement of informations.

          i would look at their income and look at deeds of trust for their loan and shake my head.

          but it wasn't our job to see who can afford what. the lenders were just too stupid and greedy.
          they were bullied by the govt...

          ****s

          Originally posted by Left Banned Tua View Post
          well....... it's the principle.

          slavery ended didn't it.

          it wouldn't have happened without lincoln.
          oh cmon, you think we'd still have slavery w/o lincoln??

          lincoln wanted the federation, his goal was to remove power from the states and give it to one powerful federal govt

          and the sneaky **** pulled it off

          Comment


          • #35
            Why dont white people get have their own month of heritage? Blacks have February and all Hispanics have September through October.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Texanballer View Post
              Why dont white people get have their own month of heritage? Blacks have February and all Hispanics have September through October.
              why is there no "united Caucasian college fund"???

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Texanballer View Post
                Why dont white people get have their own month of heritage? Blacks have February and all Hispanics have September through October.
                how about we just not have any of those stupid heritage months?

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Left Banned Tua View Post
                  how about we just not have any of those stupid heritage months?

                  ding, ding ding

                  you can't create equality by creating biases


                  dumb govt ****s

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by -veteran420- View Post
                    why is there no "united Caucasian college fund"???
                    if someone ever starts a National Association for the Advancement of White People.........they'd go to jail.

                    the truth.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by -veteran420- View Post
                      they were bullied by the govt...

                      ****s



                      oh cmon, you think we'd still have slavery w/o lincoln??

                      lincoln wanted the federation, his goal was to remove power from the states and give it to one powerful federal govt

                      and the sneaky **** pulled it off
                      no. the lenders were not bullied by the gov't.

                      the gov't gave them a reason to make money and they ran with it.




                      lincoln was anti-slavery long before he ever got the presidency.

                      he might have made the federal gov't stronger to accomplish his goals though.

                      i'm glad you bring it up though.

                      a lot of people want to demonize the south as being pro-slavery but they don't realize that the south's main issue was the balance of state's rights and federal power.

                      to the north and to most people now they think the civil war was fought because of slavery. they don't realize for the south it was not slavery but for states rights.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP