Comments Thread For: Thurman: Hard To Be Confident in Brook, He Hasn't Proved It at 147

[tokon]

it's actually spence that has not proven anything yet....brook has a W vs a fighter thurman struggled against as well...

but then again, spence does look like the goods

best fight this year imo

Yes, this fight is an interesting one with real potential. A lot of questions to be answered about Spence and, although I sort of agree with much that Thurman said about Brook, I am not sure why Brook is not a clear favourite to win.

[Bronx2245]

Since he beat Porter by Majority Decision in 2014, he's fought Jo Jo Dan, Frankie Gavin, and Kevin Bizier @ 147, and then got demolished by GGG @ 160. I can't have any confidence in Brook @ 147 either.

[Metho_4u]

Didnt Brook beat Porter more convincing than Thurman?

Yes, and hurt him more often too

[Outwest Exp 355]

Didnt Brook beat Porter more convincing than Thurman?

Yes but he didn't do much before or since.

[Kcvtr81]

Brook will flatten spence in rd 5, #mandown������

[CONTROVERSIAL]

Spot on thurman.....

[.!WAR MIKEY!.]

lmfao how dumb is thurman?

spence is the one who hasnt proved shit at 147

and brook beat porter in better and cleaner fashion than thurman did.

so wtf is you talking about

[TheUptownKid]

If brook couldn't get fights as a champion, he damn sure won't get them as an unproven former champ with a loss as their career highlight. Spence could lose this fight and still make his way to another title shot next year, brook faces true obscurity.

A lot is on the line for my guy.

[bluemax]

To be fair Brooks beat Porter by being allowed to hold for the whole fight while the seemingly blind referee said nothing. I think if the ref had done his job Porter would have beaten Brooks

[Dean_Razorback]

i like one time but the only difference between them is garcia imo