Fury vs Wilder (Actual Punches Landed)

[D4thincarnation]

I thought the punches wilder knocked fury down with were just about the only punches he landed.
I always thought the idea fury only landed 13 more than wilder was a bit of a stretch to believe

Yeah compubox is just a couple of guys pushing buttons, and many of Wilder's punches just missed Fury by millimeters.

[juggernaut666]

Sure, if you can do a better job, do it and post the video.

If not, stop your *****ing.

He's a Wilder fan , probably can't count past 50.

On the video ? Good display, he even missed a few Wilder shots but wouldn't effect the punch count significantly. A fight like this jabs are important with so few power punches landing, I generally count them separate unless power ones land.

[mcdonalds]

Sure, if you can do a better job, do it and post the video.

If not, stop your *****ing.

You must be Artorias boxing.

What kind of person takes his time to purposely make inaccurate punch stat videos?

[REDEEMER]

Shocked a certain fan base has not crowded up the thread with stories and dissolution. Ha

[travestyny]

Oh geez, can we please stop posting these Artorias "My Compubox is better than your Compubox" videos.

The dude has the ability to use slow-motion and rewind, and still can't tell when a punch lands. And Compubox is NOT how a fight is scored. It's beyond pathetic.

[REDEEMER]

Oh geez, can we please stop posting these Artorias "My Compubox is better than your Compubox" videos.

The dude has the ability to use slow-motion and rewind, and still can't tell when a punch lands. And Compubox is NOT how a fight is scored. It's beyond pathetic.

The video clearly shows what punches are landing, posters who are Wilder fans won t like the video because it exposes it as not as much close fight as the crazy Wilder group think. Compound can be manipulated through agenda or personal bias to sway public opinion. The actual punch for punch count shown cannot unless one can't count?

[D4thincarnation]

Oh geez, can we please stop posting these Artorias "My Compubox is better than your Compubox" videos.

The dude has the ability to use slow-motion and rewind, and still can't tell when a punch lands. And Compubox is NOT how a fight is scored. It's beyond pathetic.

His punch count is better than compubox.

He shows what lands and what misses.

And clean hard punching is one category which boxing is judged on.

The others is defense, ring general ship and effective aggression, Which Fury would be superior in all of them as well.

You are welcome to try and do a better job, or find me someone else who has done a better job, but so far, I have seen nobody that comes close.

[travestyny]

The video clearly shows what punches are landing, posters who are Wilder fans won t like the video because it exposes it as not as much close fight as the crazy Wilder group think. Compound can be manipulated through agenda or personal bias to sway public opinion. The actual punch for punch count shown cannot unless one can't count?

I haven't watch the video, but iff it's anything like the other videos, it's flawed. And even if it's accurate, doing the "my compubox is better than your compubox" routine is not how a fight is scored.

[travestyny]

His punch count is better than compubox.

He shows what lands and what misses.

And clean hard punching is one category which boxing is judged on.

The others is defense, ring general ship and effective aggression, Which Fury would be superior in all of them as well.

You are welcome to try and do a better job, or find me someone else who has done a better job, but so far, I have seen nobody that comes close.

There is no reason to do a better job. You just said you believe fury did a better job at defense, ring generalship, and effective aggression, so this video is pointless. The title is "Why fury won," right, yet you already exposed that this is only concerning one criteria....not even well because it doesn't take into account hard punches as you've said above.

It's only a compubox. That's not how a fight is scored.

[D4thincarnation]

There is no reason to do a better job. You just said you believe fury did a better job at defense, ring generalship, and effective aggression, so this video is pointless. The title is "Why fury won," right, yet you already exposed that this is only concerning one criteria....not even well because it doesn't take into account hard punches as you've said above.

It's only a compubox. That's not how a fight is scored.

But for purely counting landed punches, it the best we got.

Glad you agree.