![]() |
#11 |
Amateur
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Did Buster Douglas Really Beat Mike Tyson??
Yes. Absolutely, unequivocably without a shred of a doubt. At work the next day after this fight, the guys at work were saying that Buster cheated, Tyson was paid off, there was a long count etc. Turns out none of them had seen the fight. It also turns out, in my experience, is that articles like these are written for people who didn't see the fight. If you saw this fight, you know that article is a crock of ****. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Contender
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 314
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
The rules state "..to the count of ten" It does not say 10 seconds. If you watch the replay, the timekeeper with the gloves on is counting a little on the fast side. Tyson isn't even in a neutral corner and he is well into the count. He looks like one of those guys at the stock exchange trying to unload a million shares of Tyson Inc. before it goes in the crapper.
Tyson had him..blah, blah, blah. There were more rounds in the fight you know. Like the the very next round where Douglas came out and started really laying some leather on Tyson. Besides, I don't hear any of the Tyson nuthuggers complaining that the Williams or Ruddock I fights were stopped to quick. Face it, Tyson is like the old lady in that commercial, when he falls, he can't get up. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Undisputed Champion
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,036
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Rep Power: 35 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Yes, Tyson lost that fight but he looked like ****. Douglas did not get the Tyson of old he got the Tyson who was falling apart.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 843
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Rep Power: 29 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
! ! ! !
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 9,482
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Rep Power: 4037 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Tyson lost because Douglas was too big, fast, skilled, & fearless for Tyson's stubby ass to ever handle.
Tyson was "out of it" in that fight because Douglas took him out of it. Tyson at his best could never handle the Douglas who beat him that night. It was a borderline mismatch....& a total ass-whupping. |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
hagler ud over Leonard
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Placentia,CA.
Posts: 4,136
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Rep Power: 9910 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
stir that pot Jabs! Image View Removed. Please Click Here.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|