Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jacobs Best Win Versus Golovkin's Best Win

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Kigali View Post
    He beat his Lemieux/Quillan equal sooner and more decisive than GG did.
    Actually a dominant beating over several rounds is more convincing than a first round KO. First round KO's are pretty rare at that level and I seriously doubt Jacobs would win in such a manner 10 times out of 10.

    But like I said, the wins are pretty much equal.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by therealpugilist View Post
      Murray>Quillin?.....bro stop trying to pump up GGG's opposition

      martin murray has lost to every top ten contender he has faced..LITERALLY

      Couldnt even beat a shot Abraham

      Quillin is more talented and has a better resume than Lemieux...less losses as well. He has been in with and beat better fighters as well.
      Murray IMO beat Sturm, had a very close fight against Martinez and was the most recent fighter that lasted longer against GGG. He is a solid fighter but not a great fighter. His lack of power is what has held him back

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by TOBYLEE1 View Post
        Murray IMO beat Sturm, had a very close fight against Martinez and was the most recent fighter that lasted longer against GGG. He is a solid fighter but not a great fighter. His lack of power is what has held him back
        the man has 0 official wins over world class opposition....moral victories mean nothing

        Martin Murray's name wouldnt even come up on this site, if he wasnt GGG's best or one of his best opponents.....lets keep it 100% and its pretty pathetic that a p4p entrants top win is against a guy who has done nothing on the world stage

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by therealpugilist View Post
          the man has 0 official wins over world class opposition....moral victories mean nothing

          Martin Murray's name wouldnt even come up on this site, if he wasnt GGG's best or one of his best opponents.....lets keep it 100% and its pretty pathetic that a p4p entrants top win is against a guy who has done nothing on the world stage
          Murray is a solid fighter and a solid win, especially stopping him. Which by the way it was via accumulation.

          Not saying that Murray is good but from the lower tier of fighters there are good solid fighters. Lemieux is a solid fighter but if it wasn't for his power he is very limited but still a good win the way triple G handled him. Jacobs only has Quillin.

          I give GGG the edge in facing better competition.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by therealpugilist View Post
            Murray>Quillin?.....bro stop trying to pump up GGG's opposition

            martin murray has lost to every top ten contender he has faced..LITERALLY

            Couldnt even beat a shot Abraham

            Quillin is more talented and has a better resume than Lemieux...less losses as well. He has been in with and beat better fighters as well.
            Who are these fighters that Quillin has beat that makes his resume clearly better than Lemieux? Their resumes are nearly identical as far as names worth mentioning outside of Winky, who was so far past it its not even funny, and Lee, who if it were'nt for a bad call on the one knockdown, Quillin lost to. I mean a Lee who was schooled by the likes of Korobov and Jackson before uncorking his signature KO shot. But I'm suppose to believe Quillin has all this talent when he could'nt even outbox him?

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by TOBYLEE1 View Post
              Murray is a solid fighter and a solid win, especially stopping him. Which by the way it was via accumulation.

              Not saying that Murray is good but from the lower tier of fighters there are good solid fighters. Lemieux is a solid fighter but if it wasn't for his power he is very limited but still a good win the way triple G handled him. Jacobs only has Quillin.

              I give GGG the edge in facing better competition.
              it was a good win but should it , arguably, be the best win on a p4p entrants resume? hell to the naw...murray is a decent euro level fighter who can give world class guys good work but 0 wins

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by DreamerUSA View Post
                Who are these fighters that Quillin has beat that makes his resume clearly better than Lemieux? Their resumes are nearly identical as far as names worth mentioning outside of Winky, who was so far past it its not even funny, and Lee, who if it were'nt for a bad call on the one knockdown, Quillin lost to. I mean a Lee who was schooled by the likes of Korobov and Jackson before uncorking his signature KO shot. But I'm suppose to believe Quillin has all this talent when he could'nt even outbox him?
                he drew with Lee...who is better than anyone Lemieux has beat or drew with

                He also beat N'Dam first, also beat former champion Winky Wright

                fringe guys and former contenders Echols, Brinkley, Rosado, Guerrero

                He clearly has a better resume than Lemieux and no losses to a shot Alcine and NEVER was Rubio

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Jubei View Post
                  Lemieux has fought the same guys as Quillin, he just beat them much better. Lemieux > Quillin,
                  How is Lemieux better than Quillin when Lemieux had the TWO losses - with one by knockout?

                  Put down the crack pipe.

                  Quillin >>> Lemieux

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by therealpugilist View Post
                    he drew with Lee...who is better than anyone Lemieux has beat or drew with

                    He also beat N'Dam first, also beat former champion Winky Wright

                    fringe guys and former contenders Echols, Brinkley, Rosado, Guerrero

                    He clearly has a better resume than Lemieux and no losses to a shot Alcine and NEVER was Rubio
                    ^This right here...

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by therealpugilist View Post
                      he drew with Lee...who is better than anyone Lemieux has beat or drew with

                      He also beat N'Dam first, also beat former champion Winky Wright

                      fringe guys and former contenders Echols, Brinkley, Rosado, Guerrero

                      He clearly has a better resume than Lemieux and no losses to a shot Alcine and NEVER was Rubio
                      You mean the Lee whose best wins are Vera, Jackson and Korobov? Whom two of the three boxed Andy's ears off.

                      Lemieux beat N'Dam, Guerrero and Rosado. Why bring up a shot to **** Echols who was 2-3-3 in his last eight fights when he fought Quillin? Why bring up Winky when he had'nt fought in 3 years, was 1-2-1 in his last 4 fights and had'nt had a meaningful win in 7 years? And Brinkley? Cmon man. If we are going to dig that deep to pump a guys resume then you have to give credit to Lemieux for Camacho Jr. and Tapia

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP