Originally posted by Fists_of_Fury
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Terence Crawford is more skilled than Vasyl Lomachenko (without weight being factor)
Collapse
-
-
-
-
Originally posted by Fists_of_Fury View PostWho has either actually beat lol? Lomachencko does have a better resume than Crawford and Loma's resume is complete **** for a p4p top fighter.
Comment
-
Both are awesome fighters, love watching them both. I'm just going to pick one aspect because it is what comes to mind when thinking of these two:
I think Crawford is better in close quarters than Lomachenko who will often look to the ref for help in a clinch....he does that quite often even when he is the one initiating a hold. It would be one think if he was the one being held....but it's the other way around....he holds and then looks to the ref - to me that is the worst part about his game.
In the Salido fight the lack of activity inside allowed him to get roughed up and cost him precious time - time that he could have used as he almost got Salido out of there toward the end. And in the Sosa fight even though he appeared completely dominant- there were times he was looking to the ref for help when Sosa got in? Terrible look for a fighter of this caliber I thought
Crawford isn't spectacular in there either, but he can knows how to slither out of certain situations get an arm free and throw dangerous punches in that range.
DEfensively, I think both are more hittable than advertised but I think Lomachenko feels less vulnerable to getting hurt. Crawford's is taking gambles and sometimes he feels very open and i don't want to say sloppy...just high risky. Both win in ways that I don't always expect and that is why both are very exciting to watch
Comment
Comment