Tweet
Is Groves in the top 3 at 168 and Saunders top 3 at 160? What does that say about Eubank, could he still be near the top of each division, top 5? top10?
-
14Yes - BOTH are in the Top 3 of their divisions64.29%9ONLY Groves is top 3 at 16821.43%3ONLY Saunders is top 3 at 1607.14%1NO - Neither fighter is top 3 of their divisions7.14%1 -
No and no. Though Saunders has a stronger case for being #3 behind canelo and ggg. But I still have Jacobs at #3 -
Groves is easily Top 2 at 168, #1 IMO.Originally posted by FlatLine View Post
BJS is the clear #3 behind GGG and Canelo at 160.
Eubank is probably fringe top 10, 168 is a very thin division so he’s probably top 10 in that weight category.Comment
-
WTF???? Name 3 super middles better than Groves😂😂😂Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali View PostComment
-
Yeah, both are top 3, hard to argue against.
And no, Eubank isn't a top guy at any division unless you have him closer to 10 I guess for filler.Comment
-
Right, one can even argue that Groves is #1 since Degale lost. Ring has him at #2 and Gilberto Ramirez at #1, who honestly, doesn't have a good resume yet.Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View PostComment
-
Yes. Double G could beat anybody at SMW, same with BJS at 160.Comment
-
Yeah exactly, he’s clearly top 2 at 168. Certainly top 3.Originally posted by _original_ View PostComment
-
I can only think of 2 168 pound boxers who I think could beat Groves. I can think of 3 160 pound boxers who could beat Saunders in my opinion. I would favor GGG, Canelo and Jacobs to beat Saunders. They would have a hard fight with him but I think they would beat him. So Groves makes my top 3 at 168 but Saunders comes in at 4th at 160.Comment
-
Top five middles are debatable. I don't see how Groves could 4th or further at super middle.Last edited by Mammoth; 02-20-2018, 08:38 PM.Comment
Comment