Originally posted by TBear
View Post
But today, you can add ‘now there are so many world titles it has been deluted (not) a bit (but a lot).’
Defenders of all these belts say the boxers benefit of it, making more money (?) and making them proud, and if that is the case, I accept it.
But it has certainly been damaging to the sport – I wrote it before, friends of mine not that interested in boxing, taunt me: “isn’t boxing the sport where there are more champions that challengers?”
Quoting a letter to the Sept. issue of The Ring magazine: “My frustration is boiling over to anger at the sport that I love. Only in boxing can we have four or more so-called ‘world champions’ in one weight division. That’s 68 champions in 17 weight classes … Let’s stop chasing the four so-called belts, because the reality is that on the rare occasion that they are unified, the next minute fighters are stripped and we always end up back at square one … [The lineal champion] Once upon a time, we knew who the champion was when he entered the ring, and he did not even have to have a belt around his waist – or several, for that matter.”
Comment