Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Dillian Whyte has been WBC #1 for 600 days. Never been made mandatory.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by kafkod View Post
    That wasn't a genuine final eliminator offer. It would have been a final eliminator the position of second mandatory, which was a piece of bull**** invented by Sulaiman to fob Whyte off.
    Why would Whyte get a final eliminator that would place him ahead of someone who already won a final eliminator?

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by kafkod View Post
      But why was Breazeale the mandatory? Why didn't the WBC order a final eliminator between Breazeale and Whyte, who was their number one contender?

      What makes it even more shady is that Breazeale turned down an offer from Hearn to fight Dillian right before the WBC arbitrarily decided that Breeazeale vs Molina was going to be a final eliminator - but only for Breazeale, not for Molina.

      The present day WBC are a the most corrupt sanctioning body in boxing history.
      Steverne was the #1 ranked in WBC Steverne v Breazeale was sanctioned by the WBC as final eliminator contracts were signed for Nov 4th at Barclay

      Steverne withdrew from the fight #4 ranked Dillian Whyte was offered the fight on Nov 4th they didn't want it instead Hearn offered Breazeale to fight Whyte on the undercard of AJ on October Breazeale refused and went on to fight the next available ranked WBC Molina

      Pretty sure this was explained to you before but there you go

      Comment


      • #33
        https://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/...te-eddie-hearn -06/2018

        Pulev (25-1, 13KOs) had been ordered to fight in a final eliminator with Whyte for the right to be the mandatory challenger for the IBF title.
        "We won the IBF purse bid rights with almost double the money they offered. Nobody wants to fight Dilian? YOU ARE DELUSIONAL MAN!
        Gotta wonder why the offer from Whyte's side was so low unless it was a fight they just did not want.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Mammoth View Post
          Why would Whyte get a final eliminator that would place him ahead of someone who already won a final eliminator?
          Why was that final eliminator between Breazeale and Molina, when Whyte was the No1 contender?

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Phenom View Post
            Steverne was the #1 ranked in WBC Steverne v Breazeale was sanctioned by the WBC as final eliminator contracts were signed for Nov 4th at Barclay

            Steverne withdrew from the fight #4 ranked Dillian Whyte was offered the fight on Nov 4th they didn't want it instead Hearn offered Breazeale to fight Whyte on the undercard of AJ on October Breazeale refused and went on to fight the next available ranked WBC Molina

            Pretty sure this was explained to you before but there you go
            That's bull****. Whyte was never offered a final eliminator with Breazeale.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by kafkod View Post
              That's bull****. Whyte was never offered a final eliminator with Breazeale.
              No he was offered the fight as a replacement opponent and then again to fight Ortiz for interim and now Rivas who he hand picked for the interim

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Phenom View Post
                No he was offered the fight as a replacement opponent and then again to fight Ortiz for interim and now Rivas who he hand picked for the interim
                And that is the first part of Hearn/Whyte's beef with the WBC. He was the highest ranked available replacement for Stiverne and ranked higher than Breazeale, so why didn't the WBC offer him the fight as a final eliminator?
                Last edited by kafkod; 06-20-2019, 04:39 PM.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Phenom View Post
                  What hurdle did he clear? Name just one
                  Well, they keep on telling him that he has to beat one guy and then he has to beat another for an elimination. I would had like to see him fight Ortiz but how many others he has to clear. He has fought decent opposition, more than others but yet is to get a shot. I am no fan but at least he is one of the few that are trying.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by STREET CLEANER View Post
                    Well, they keep on telling him that he has to beat one guy and then he has to beat another for an elimination. I would had like to see him fight Ortiz but how many others he has to clear. He has fought decent opposition, more than others but yet is to get a shot. I am no fan but at least he is one of the few that are trying.
                    He fought Helenius for the WBC Silver title he hasn't fought any final eliminators for WBC or any other organization in fact he is no longer ranked and dropped in the IBF because he turned down the Pulev fight

                    WBC were within their right to drop him too after he turned down the Ortiz fight

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                      And that is the first part of Hearn/Whyte's beef with the WBC. He was the highest ranked available replacement for Stiverne and ranked higher than Breazeale, so why didn't the WBC offer him the fight as a final eliminator?
                      I am telling you the fight was there for him on Nov 4 2017 but they didn't take it maybe because the money or maybe because it's in America instead they wanted Breazeale to travel to the UK and he didn't need to do that because he has a sanctioned contract to fight eliminator

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP