Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

USA is biggest threat to world peace

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
    None of what I said had anything to do with the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
    I guess you missed what I was saying. A lot of the conspiracies theories regarding the Russian revolution come from the Protocols, the original conspiracy theory. Those conspiracy theories evolve and changed depending on the agenda.

    And the bankers did fund the Russian revolution, to say it is without historical truth or accuracy is incorrect.
    So you're saying Bankers funded the Bolsheviks' revolution for 20+ years? Revolution is a long process, it took decades and millions of lives pointlessly lost in WWI and terrible living conditions for Russians under the Tsarist rule to get to that point. It didn't simply happen over night, it took many years of organizing, selling their daily paper (hundreds of thousands were sold daily), a failed revolution in 1905, massive strikes and protests by the workers, complete civil unrest and so on. It was the biggest workers uprising this world has seen; bankers simply cannot make that happen by "funding" a political party and to say otherwise is doing a huge disservice to the people who lived and died fighting for what they believed in during those times.

    Comment


    • #62
      WIN/Gallup International, the leading global association in market research and polling, in 2013 published results of its annual End of Year Survey and suggested that the US is considered to be the greatest threat to peace in the world, followed by Pakistan and China,

      http://www.wingia.com/en/services/en..._results/7/33/

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by ИATAS View Post
        So you're saying Bankers funded the Bolsheviks' revolution for 20+ years? Revolution is a long process, it took decades and millions of lives pointlessly lost in WWI and terrible living conditions for Russians under the Tsarist rule to get to that point. It didn't simply happen over night, it took many years of organizing, selling their daily paper (hundreds of thousands were sold daily), a failed revolution in 1905, massive strikes and protests by the workers, complete civil unrest and so on. It was the biggest workers uprising this world has seen; bankers simply cannot make that happen by "funding" a political party and to say otherwise is doing a huge disservice to the people who lived and died fighting for what they believed in during those times.
        Yes. Much of the planning, the leadership, and the financing for the Bolshevik revolution came from bankers in the U.S., Germany, and London. They were trying to topple the Tsar even going back to the Russo-Japanese war where Jacob Schiff funded Japan. That country even gave him a medal for his support.

        As for the socialist ideas that influenced the worker's uprising it's thought that wealthy financiers has a hand there too. People back then weren't stupid and suspected it themselves, as this 1911 political cartoon from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch shows:



        Karl Marx surrounded by enthusiastic Wall Street financiers: Morgan partner George Perkins, J.P. Morgan, John Ryan of National City Bank, John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie. Immediately behind Marx is Teddy Roosevelt, leader of the Progressive Party.
        Last edited by ShoulderRoll; 08-07-2016, 09:26 AM.

        Comment


        • #64
          wars are expensive. If you were weapons manufacturer, or a miner in need of more commodities to sell then peace isn't exactly good for business.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by AddiX View Post
            This is another ridiculous connecting dots and turning it into some kind of a major conspiracy theory.

            Is it really hard to believe that powerful international bankers just happen to work with a lot of international clients?

            These people don't care about creating conflict, they just want money.

            This is almost ridiculous as the ******ed threat about Hillary Clinton assassinating a god damn mailman. Not quite as ******ed, but almost...




            are you suggesting that false flag events are untrue?

            Comment


            • #66




              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by bigjavi973 View Post




                are you suggesting that false flag events are untrue?
                Most of them, yeah. Do they happen? Of course. But the ones people talk about are mostly bs.

                People try to connect some simple dots and than all of a sudden turn it into something crazy, without a shred of any evidence.

                It's fcking ******ed.

                Almost every time there is a mass shooting Alex Jones is all the over place calling it a false flag event to take our guns away, and his righty ******ed following repeats the nonsense.

                Everyone wants to blame everything on some kind of false flag event.

                Comment

                Working...
                X
                TOP