California becomes 1st state to appoint illegal alien to state office

[////]

Drop a credible link.

I cited the source (Dr. Davis) but here is a link to prove I'm not just making some figure or research up:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2004/...ducation.books

For comparison only about 390,000 Africans were transported to (what would become) the US (and of course barely any to Europe). It was one of the most minor slave trades going on in the world at the time. The largest were the brazilian and Arab trades.

If you took a random white guy of the street with no stake in the Americas or in Africa, say Belgian guy, which do you think he would express stronger emotion about? The 1.25 million free Europeans who were captured and enslaved by African pirates, or the 390k already-enslaved Africans who were purchased to the Americas where their offspring basically ended up winning the lottery.

He wouldn't even know about the Europeans at all & would say "huh tough luck" upon seeing the fitures. He would probably work up some hysterical tears over US slavery (a conditioned reaction).

Not logical, but the product of the information he's been allowed to access since the Marxist revolution in western academia. He has only been told about "white privilege" and how it is a justification for European population replacement & allowing the far-left to run amok.

History was brutality in all directions; white people just seem to have a weak ability to plot for their own interests on an adaptive/cultural level & are easily singled out for their physical traits, so they are perpetual scapegoats.

[siablo14]

I cited the source (Dr. Davis) but here is a link to prove I'm not just making some figure or research up:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2004/...ducation.books

For comparison only about 390,000 Africans were transported to (what would become) the US (and of course barely any to Europe). It was one of the most minor slave trades going on in the world at the time. The largest were the brazilian and Arab trades.

If you took a random white guy of the street with no stake in the Americas or in Africa, say Belgian guy, which do you think he would express stronger emotion about? The 1.25 million free Europeans who were captured and enslaved by African pirates, or the 390k already-enslaved Africans who were purchased to the Americas where their offspring basically ended up winning the lottery.

He wouldn't even know about the Europeans at all & would say "huh tough luck" upon seeing the fitures. He would probably work up some hysterical tears over US slavery (a conditioned reaction).

Not logical, but the product of the information he's been allowed to access since the Marxist revolution in western academia. He has only been told about "white privilege" and how it is a justification for European population replacement & allowing the far-left to run amok.

History was brutality in all directions; white people just seem to have a weak ability to plot for their own interests on an adaptive/cultural level & are easily singled out for their physical traits, so they are perpetual scapegoats.

There were about 5 million slaves in USA during slavery.

[////]

There were about 5 million slaves in USA during slavery.

Only about 390k slaves were ever transported to the US, which is something like 1% of the global slave trade for the day. The black population grew just like the rest of the US population grew over time. They would go on to live the pampered lives of modern Americans while the Europeans enslaved by African pirates apparently didn't fare so well.

How many global tears shed for the 1.25 million free people enslaved then dusted VS the 390k purchased then liberated? How many epic movements, how much scapegoating, etc? You can cherrypick these events at will. Human life before the firearm liberated people from the rule of strongmen was nothing but **** and pain and slavery as a general rule. Take your pick of human rights violation.

All social control however is based on selective information control. If you can convince a poorer angier more bigoted group A that group B is the reason for all of their suffering because of (random event C) then there's no law that you have to offset it by mentioning the injustice group B have also faced and overcome historically. You got your votes & your base of loyal idiots. Mission accomplished.

"White privilege" and the "white man's burden" are one in the same — the group tends toward higher wealth and innovation because of its extremely high levels of social trust. It also gets raped and guilt tripped and inevitably bred out of every civilization it settles by groups with lower social trust.

[siablo14]

I cited the source (Dr. Davis) but here is a link to prove I'm not just making some figure or research up:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2004/...ducation.books

For comparison only about 390,000 Africans were transported to (what would become) the US (and of course barely any to Europe). It was one of the most minor slave trades going on in the world at the time. The largest were the brazilian and Arab trades.

If you took a random white guy of the street with no stake in the Americas or in Africa, say Belgian guy, which do you think he would express stronger emotion about? The 1.25 million free Europeans who were captured and enslaved by African pirates, or the 390k already-enslaved Africans who were purchased to the Americas where their offspring basically ended up winning the lottery.

He wouldn't even know about the Europeans at all & would say "huh tough luck" upon seeing the fitures. He would probably work up some hysterical tears over US slavery (a conditioned reaction).

Not logical, but the product of the information he's been allowed to access since the Marxist revolution in western academia. He has only been told about "white privilege" and how it is a justification for European population replacement & allowing the far-left to run amok.

History was brutality in all directions; white people just seem to have a weak ability to plot for their own interests on an adaptive/cultural level & are easily singled out for their physical traits, so they are perpetual scapegoats.

Those were Muslims overlords and it said they probably took slaves from West Africa, Eastern Europe, Britain, Italy, etc. The information hasn't been verified but he is estimating the numbers based on the different spots the Muslim overlords took slaves from.

But this info has brought a different look to White being Superior overall discussion. The post name 2Fast should read this but at the same time that type of slavery was not as horrible as chattel salvery.

[siablo14]

Only about 390k slaves were ever transported to the US, which is something like 1% of the global slave trade for the day. The black population grew just like the rest of the US population grew over time. They would go on to live the pampered lives of modern Americans while the Europeans enslaved by African pirates apparently didn't fare so well.

How many global tears shed for the 1.25 million free people enslaved then dusted VS the 390k purchased then liberated? How many epic movements, how much scapegoating, etc? You can cherrypick these events at will. Human life before the firearm liberated people from the rule of strongmen was nothing but **** and pain and slavery as a general rule. Take your pick of human rights violation.

All social control however is based on selective information control. If you can convince a poorer angier more bigoted group A that group B is the reason for all of their suffering because of (random event C) then there's no law that you have to offset it by mentioning the injustice group B have also faced and overcome historically. You got your votes & your base of loyal idiots. Mission accomplished.

"White privilege" and the "white man's burden" are one in the same — the group tends toward higher wealth and innovation because of its extremely high levels of social trust. It also gets raped and guilt tripped and inevitably bred out of every civilization it settles by groups with lower social trust.

The black population? You mean the slaves were bred like animals and made to work for free for centuries?
Don't try and humanize it now. They were viewed as property to breed and sell as the planters felt.

How can we shed tears for numbers that haven't been verified? The millions of Black slaves stories have been documented. Other researchers are saying your guy is over-exaggerating. Those Whites the Muslim overlords captured weren't held in chattel slavery plus one of the reasons they started capturing White slaves is because the Europeans had cut into their pool of Black slaves.

[Cheek busting]

I believe they have been doing it for years.

They are starting to realize they need to push their interests as a group like all the other races do.

But before 2012-2013, they didn't do it, or those who did were labeled racists, etc.

Even though we still are, but since more and more Whites are either openly speaking up, or agreeing in silence and casting their vote to show support, it's changing.

We will not lose our European homelands. Oh yes - the tide is turning.

Whether or not you want to admit it, you know that Jamaica would no longer be the Jamaica of old, if European "migrants" were coming over by the hundreds of thousands every year. Or if Japanese, etc.

It's perfectly fine for Whites, and Asians to migrate to Jamaica in small numbers that won't really effect the overall demographics. And it's perfectly fine for anybody to vacation, or do business, etc. but when people start moving there in such large masses it takes effect on the demographics, that is when enough is enough.

Jamaica is for black people to run and control - period.

[siablo14]

They are starting to realize they need to push their interests as a group like all the other races do.

But before 2012-2013, they didn't do it, or those who did were labeled racists, etc.

Even though we still are, but since more and more Whites are either openly speaking up, or agreeing in silence and casting their vote to show support, it's changing.

We will not lose our European homelands. Oh yes - the tide is turning.

European homelands? Your people's birthrate is low. You won't be holding on to anything.
How many children do you have?

[Cheek busting]

European homelands? Your people's birthrate is low. You won't be holding on to anything.
How many children do you have?

We'll be just fine. I'm just glad we're finally putting an end to immigration en masse.

We can sort out our birthrates in time.

I don't have any children now, but I plan on having 3-5 when I'm settled down.

We tend to be responsible and wait to have kids - we don't have kids we can't properly support.

[Cheek busting]

European homelands? Your people's birthrate is low. You won't be holding on to anything.
How many children do you have?

And what's wrong with European homelands?

Is England, Italy, Germany, Spain, Portugal, Greece, Ireland, etc. not countries for those people?

Just like ghana, Ethiopia, Nigeria, gabon are African homelands?

[siablo14]

We'll be just fine. I'm just glad we're finally putting an end to immigration en masse.

We can sort out our birthrates in time.

I don't have any children now, but I plan on having 3-5 when I'm settled down.

We tend to be responsible and wait to have kids - we don't have kids we can't properly support.

Actually nah. Some y'all aint having none. When will you be settled? You already said your financials are quite comfortable.