Khan's 4 Opponents At 147 Superior To Brook & Thurman's Career Opposition At 147?

[boliodogs]

You don't know what the fuc you are talking about famous Khan lover. Do you actual research where these guys are ranked at the time of the fight?????? Apparently not because you are completely wrong about who faced the better and higher ranked competition. Diaz was ranked about number 50 by boxrec who are the only ones who rank fighters this bad. Khan fought him at a catchweight of 143 so it wasn't even a true welterweight fight which everybody knows is 147 NOT 143. Collazo was ranked 28th by Boxrec at the time he fought Khan. Alexander was ranked 10th and he is the only top 10 welterweight Khan ever beat. Algieri had NO Ranking at 147 at all. He was ranked 9th at 140, but unranked at 147. Brook beat Porter who was ranked 4th at the time of the fight and had already defeated Alexander who is by far Khan best win and Khan's only win over a rated welterweight. Brook also KOed Dan who was ranked 10 at the time. Thurman has wins over Soto Cross or however his name spelled and wins over Chavez and Guerrero and they were all ranked in the top 10 in the world at the time Thurman fought them. One huge detail you purposely leave out is the Brook and Thurman have never lost a fight while Khan has lost three fights, two by KO. All three of the guys who beat Khan would surely lose to Brook or Thurman. Brook and Thurman are both ranked higher than Khan as of course they should be. Quit making it sound like Khan doesn't have to fight guys like Thurman and Brook. They are exactly who he should be fighting if he wants to prove he is the best at 147. All Khan does is declare himself the best and then fight 2nd rate fighters who can't break an egg. Khan is afraid to fight Brook or Thurman and that's very obvious. Thurman and Brook on the other hand would love to fight Khan.

[boliodogs]

Khan had a life and death struggle with Diaz and escaped with a close home country points win after getting off the floor. Thurman fought this same Diaz less than a year later and destroyed Diaz in three rounds. So there you have a direct comparison of Khan and Thurman against the same opponent. Algieri said Khan can't punch and Pacquiao hit vastly harder than Khan and is a much better fighter.

[Scipio2009]

Khan has only had 4 fights above the light welterweight limit but overall has he fought better opposition at the weight than both Brook and Thurman who have had 60 fights combined?

Khan's opponents above 140 are ALL former world champions: Julio Diaz, Luis Collazo, Devon Alexander, Chris Algieri

Brook notable opponent at 147: Shawn Porter

Thurman notable opponents at 147: Robert Guerrero, Julio Diaz + (arguably) Carlos Quitana, Diego Chaves.

So there we have it.

lol

-Julio Diaz won a lightweight belt nearly eight years before the Khan fight, a fight that he took at the age of 34, 15 years into his professional career.
-Chris Algieri stepped up to his first fight as a top 140lber (won the fight), only to get utterly washed in his secod meaningful fight

Collazo and Alexander are fine

Brook beating Porter is arguably a better win than any fight Khan has ever been in, let alone limiting things to just 147.

quit trying to trick people; not worth the effort

[Larry the boss]

]Collazo KOd Ortiz quicker than your pilipino idol Floyd did and he didn't need a suckerpunch to do it either like some sort of coward lol.. [/SIZE]

Most people had Julio Diaz beating Porter in the first fight - yep, same guy people rate Brook for beating.

Ortiz was also coming off of 2 losses a broken jaw and a year layoff....Diaz-Porter was when Porter was still learning and he came back and dominated Diaz..Please if you are going to suck off Khan get your facts straight

[Larry the boss]

Truth is Khan has done more at 147 in 4 fights than Brook has done in 35 fights. Khan's right, it just can't be denied - Brook really needs to get some more decent wins under his belt before he deserves a shot at Khan, let alone Mayweather!

Apart from actually win a world title at WW....

Ownage..................................

[Public_Enemy]

Brook's best win - Porter, is better than Khan's best win - Alexander.

In fact, Brook's best win beat Khan's best win's ass.

[Furn]

Collazo will be a good name in two weeks.

[Furn]

Khan had a life and death struggle with Diaz and escaped with a close home country points win after getting off the floor. Thurman fought this same Diaz less than a year later and destroyed Diaz in three rounds. So there you have a direct comparison of Khan and Thurman against the same opponent. Algieri said Khan can't punch and Pacquiao hit vastly harder than Khan and is a much better fighter.

Same Diaz that Porter (brooks only decent win) drew with ?

[Bushbaby]

I don't even think Khan beat Algeri. All I have to do is look at the 1st round and I knew what was coming. Nothing happened except 2 big right hands by Algeri, somehow Khan won the round, lol.

[FlatLine]

Apart from actually win a world title at WW....

Khan beat the guy who Porter won the belt from (Alexander) in far superior fashion than Porter was able to. Title schmitle..